Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GNU Make VS Haystack Analytics

Compare GNU Make VS Haystack Analytics and see what are their differences

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Haystack Analytics logo Haystack Analytics

Ship faster and improve team satisfaction with engineering analytics powered by your Github data.
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Haystack Analytics Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-24

Ship faster and improve team satisfaction with engineering analytics powered by your Github data. Analyze pull requests on the team level and get “northstar” metrics like cycle time, deployment frequency, and change failure rate to help you improve delivery. Quickly find bottlenecks like code review, experiment with changes like smaller pull requests or automated tests, and see the result.

GNU Make

Website
gnu.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Haystack Analytics

$ Details
paid Free Trial $25.0 / Monthly (Per Dev)
Platforms
Browser
Release Date
2020 January
Startup details
Country
Singapore
City
Singapore
Founder(s)
Julian Colina
Employees
1 - 9

GNU Make videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Haystack Analytics videos

Haystack (YC W21)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and Haystack Analytics)
Front End Package Manager
Data Dashboard
0 0%
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Software Engineering
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and Haystack Analytics. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Haystack Analytics seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Haystack Analytics mentions (2)

  • Launch HN: Haystack (YC W21) – Engineering analytics that don’t suck
    Heads up: site is not loading. Ios Safari & macOS Chrome. Mixed Content: The page at 'https://usehaystack.io/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure favicon 'http://www.usehaystack.io/favicon.ico'. This request has been blocked; the content must be served over HTTPS. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Launch HN: Haystack (YC W21) – Engineering analytics that don’t suck
    Hey HN! I'm Julian, co-founder of Haystack (https://usehaystack.io). We’re building one-click dashboards and alerts using Github data. While managing teams from startups to more established companies like Cloudflare, my cofounder Kan and I were constantly trying to improve our team and process. But it was pretty tough to tell if our efforts were paying off. Even tougher to tell where we could improve. We tried... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and Haystack Analytics, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

GitPrime - GitPrime uses data from any Git based code repository to give management the software engineering metrics needed to move faster and optimize work patterns.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Waydev - Waydev analyzes your codebase from Github, Gitlab, Azure DevOps & Bitbucket to help you bring out the best in your engineers work.

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

LinearB - LinearB delivers software leaders the insights they need to make their engineering teams better through a real-time SaaS platform. Visibility into key metrics paired with automated improvement actions enables software leaders to deliver more.