Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Gmsh VS NETGEN

Compare Gmsh VS NETGEN and see what are their differences

3D Cityplanner
Transforming urban planning with smarter designs, data-driven decisions, and sustainable solutions for the cities of tomorrow. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Gmsh logo Gmsh

Gmsh is a 3D finite element grid generator with a build-in CAD engine and post-processor.

NETGEN logo NETGEN

NETGEN is an automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator.
  • Gmsh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-11-13
Not present

Gmsh features and specs

  • Versatility
    Gmsh supports a wide range of geometrical shapes and types of elements, making it suitable for various applications across different domains.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, Gmsh is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute, promoting transparency and community contributions.
  • User Community
    Gmsh has an active user community which can provide support, share experiences, and contribute to the software’s growth and improvement.
  • Scripting Features
    The software offers powerful scripting capabilities, allowing users to automate and customize their meshing processes effectively.
  • Compatibility
    Gmsh is compatible with numerous file formats and can be integrated into various simulation workflows, enhancing its usability.

Possible disadvantages of Gmsh

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find Gmsh challenging to learn initially due to its extensive features and complex interface.
  • Limited GUI
    While Gmsh has a graphical user interface, it might not be as intuitive or modern as some other commercial meshing tools.
  • Documentation Gaps
    Some users may experience difficulty finding detailed and comprehensive documentation or tutorials on specific advanced features.
  • Performance
    In some cases, Gmsh might not perform as efficiently as other specialized commercial software when handling very large or complex models.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    For certain highly specialized applications, Gmsh might lack some advanced features available in dedicated software packages.

NETGEN features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Gmsh videos

+ Add

How to export Mesh in GMSH Format with Salome Meca?

More videos:

  • Review - 4-Gmsh et FreeFem++-cs:exmple 3D cube

NETGEN videos

+ Add

NetGen NG2100 Action Camera Unboxing!! #GoWithTheFlow.

More videos:

  • Review - NETGEN NG2100 ACTION CAMERA || UNBOXING ND REVIEWS||
  • Review - NETGEN Morgen 20W NFC Earth-Shaking Powerful Speaker, just WOW!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Gmsh and NETGEN)

Gmsh

NETGEN

3D
69 69%
3D
31% 31
Technical Computing
60 60%
Technical Computing
40% 40
Numerical Computation
61 61%
Numerical Computation
39% 39
CFD
56 56%
CFD
44% 44

User comments

Share your experience with using Gmsh and NETGEN. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Gmsh seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Gmsh mentions (4)

  • Having problem with setting up project with external lib
    I'm not sure if this is correct place, since my issue is most likely cmake related rather than c++, but I would like to ask anyway. So I'm trying to set up a project, which is new to me (this was usually done by someone else already). I would like to add the 3rd party library gmsh to the setup, but my CMake seems to incorrectly (or not all) link the lib. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Help With Self Study - Computational Physics
    Depending on what you are planning on trying to do. Goma and OpenFOAMare both free to download and use. You can create a mesh with gmsh for free. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Looking to build a PC for Computational fluid dynamics - Budget around $2000 CAD
    Mostly for work. I need to run some CFD models (OpenFOAM -https://openfoam.org/). But I also need to do pre-processing to create the models. I will use YADE (https://www.yade-dem.org/) and GMSH (http://gmsh.info/) for this. I think that for OpenFOAM it is more important to have good processors but for YADE and GMSH I think that I will also need a decent GPU. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Triangular meshing based on color gradient
    I tried Gmsh with the script from Prof Geuzaine, and it work pretty well. Http://gmsh.info/ Script: Http://geuz.org/photos/cg/cg.geo. Source: about 4 years ago

NETGEN mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of NETGEN yet. Tracking of NETGEN recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Gmsh and NETGEN, you can also consider the following products

Paraview - ParaView is an open-source, multi-platform application designed to visualize data sets of size...

TetGen - A Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator and a 3D Delaunay Triangulator

ANSA - Product description of ANSA pre-processor of BETA CAE Systems.

ANSYS Fluent - ANSYS engineering simulation and 3D design software delivers product modeling solutions with unmatched scalability and a comprehensive multiphysics foundation.

Blender - Blender is the open source, cross platform suite of tools for 3D creation.

Altair - Visually Analyze Any Data at the Speed of Business

Loading...