Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GitDuck VS Gitpay

Compare GitDuck VS Gitpay and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GitDuck logo GitDuck

GitDuck is the easiest way to explain your code to other developers. Show how you code and record videos linked to your source code.

Gitpay logo Gitpay

Add bounties to solve Git issues from projects.
  • GitDuck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-21
  • Gitpay Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04

GitDuck features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Gitpay features and specs

  • Remote Collaboration
    Gitpay facilitates remote work by allowing developers from various locations to collaborate on projects efficiently. It provides a platform for contributors to tackle tasks from around the globe.
  • Task-Based Payments
    Users can earn money on a per-task basis, which can be attractive for freelancers and developers looking for short-term work.
  • Open Source Contribution
    The platform promotes open source by enabling companies to post tasks from open source projects, thus encouraging contributions to such initiatives.
  • Diversified Work Opportunities
    Gitpay offers a wide variety of tasks, catering to different skill sets and providing diverse opportunities for developers.

Possible disadvantages of Gitpay

  • Limited Task Availability
    The number of available tasks may not meet the expectations of all contributors, leading to competition and limited work availability for some developers.
  • Payment Structure
    Since the platform is based on per-task payments, it may result in income instability for developers relying solely on Gitpay for earnings.
  • Project Complexity
    Some tasks may require deep understanding of the project, which can be a hurdle for new contributors who are not familiar with the specific codebase.
  • Potential for Scope Creep
    There is a risk of scope creep if tasks are not well-defined, which can lead to prolonged task completion times and inadequate compensation.

GitDuck videos

Gitduck demo

Gitpay videos

Gitpay demo

More videos:

  • Review - Open Source Stage: Gitpay – Alexandre Magno Teles Zimerer

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitDuck and Gitpay)
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Crowdfunding
0 0%
100% 100
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0
Fundraising And Donation Management

User comments

Share your experience with using GitDuck and Gitpay. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Gitpay should be more popular than GitDuck. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitDuck mentions (2)

  • Hey! We made GitHub Workspaces for hiring developers. We made it to help companies hire engineers at scale, with tasks that make sense and not binary trees! It's been quite a ride. I'm stocked to share it here!
    I think that there is something like this already, it have most the thing you have in your app, also I don't see paid plans https://gitduck.com/. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Cobrowsing: Interactive screen sharing
    First you need to have a GitDuck account and be part of a team so you can talk there. If you don't have one, just go to gitduck.com and create an account. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Gitpay mentions (3)

  • Thinking of using some bug bounty programs
    I'm thinking of using some bug bounty type of services to speed up bugfixes and adding new features, anyone has experience with it? I mean services like https://www.bountysource.com/ , https://gitpay.me/ or https://issuehunt.io/. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.1-alpha1 now available
    I don't think we have a good model for monetary rewards for maintenance. If Haskell.org was providing support contracts covering a wide range of libraries, I would guess a lot of companies would use the option. However, signing a support contract with a maintainer of every dependency I have is infeasible. Things like Gitpay (bounties for PRs) have been tried time and again, and they never take off. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Linux Guidance: Contributing
    Donate to the project, start a company employing devs, buy support from Canonical or RedHat or SuSE, pay for issues to be fixed through GitPay or BountySource. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitDuck and Gitpay, you can also consider the following products

CodeTogether - Live share IDEs and coding sessions. See changes in real time.

BountySource - BountySource is a funding platform for open-source bugs and features.

Visual Studio Live Share - Real-time collaborative development

Ko-fi - Ko-fi offers a friendly way for content creators to get paid for their work.

GitLive - Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers

Open Collective - Recurring funding for groups.