Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
GAG

Generative Art in Go VS Pattern.css

Compare Generative Art in Go VS Pattern.css and see what are their differences

Kimp
Kimp is an unlimited design company, specializing in graphic design (including print and digital designs, custom illustrations, landing page designs and email designs) and video design. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Generative Art in Go logo Generative Art in Go

Learn the basics of algorithmic art with the Go language

Pattern.css logo Pattern.css

CSS library to fill empty background with beautiful patterns
  • Generative Art in Go Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-22
  • Pattern.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

Generative Art in Go features and specs

  • Efficiency
    Go's efficient memory management and concurrency model can handle complex generative art algorithms effectively, enabling smooth and fast performance.
  • Simplicity and Readability
    Go has a simple syntax that enhances code readability, making it easier to implement and maintain generative art projects.
  • Strong Standard Library
    Go's robust standard library includes many packages that are useful for developing generative art, such as those for image manipulation and geometric calculations.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Go compiles to a single binary that can run on multiple platforms without modification, making it easy to distribute generative art applications.

Possible disadvantages of Generative Art in Go

  • Steep Learning Curve for Graphics Programming
    Go is not specifically designed for graphics programming, which may make it challenging for beginners to develop complex generative art compared to languages with more established graphics-focused ecosystems.
  • Limited Graphics Libraries
    The selection of graphics libraries and tools in Go is not as extensive as in other languages such as Python or JavaScript, which could limit creative possibilities or require additional effort to implement desired features.
  • Verbose Code
    Go can be more verbose than some scripting languages used for generative art, leading to longer development times for prototyping and experimentation.
  • Community Size
    The community focused on generative art in Go is smaller compared to other popular languages for generative art, potentially resulting in fewer resources and community support.

Pattern.css features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Pattern.css is a CSS-only library, which means it doesn't require any JavaScript, making it lightweight and easy to integrate without increasing page load times significantly.
  • Easy to Use
    A simple and straightforward way to add background patterns to your web projects, requiring minimal effort and configuration.
  • Customizable
    The patterns provided by the library can be easily customized by modifying the CSS, allowing for a wide range of design possibilities.
  • No Dependencies
    Does not require any external dependencies or frameworks, making it easier to maintain and integrate.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, it allows developers to contribute, review the code, and potentially tailor the patterns to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Pattern.css

  • Limited Patterns
    The library offers a limited set of predefined patterns, which may not fulfill every design requirement or aesthetic.
  • Browser Compatibility
    While CSS is generally well-supported, certain complex patterns or CSS features used might not be fully compatible with all older browsers.
  • Lack of Updates
    Depending on the frequency of updates and community involvement, the library might not receive timely bug fixes or enhancements.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    Although patterns can be customized, users may need a good grasp of CSS to effectively modify the existing patterns or create new ones.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Generative Art in Go and Pattern.css)

Generative Art in Go

Pattern.css

Art
100 100%
Art
0% 0
Design Tools
44 44%
Design Tools
56% 56
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100
AI
100 100%
AI
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Generative Art in Go and Pattern.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Generative Art in Go seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Generative Art in Go mentions (2)

  • My talk proposal got declined a few times. I’m trying to make sense, whether it has to do with the pitch, or it’s a topic the Go community is generally not interested to hear about.
    I assume, you also haven’t seen my book, have you: https://p5v.gumroad.com/l/generative-art-in-golang. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Get access to a free draft of my in-progress book "Write Your book With Obsidian" by answering this short survey
    To your remark about wikilinks - I wrote my first book entirely in Obsidian, but had to conform to Leanpub's limited Markdown standard, which does not support any form other than the standard way of linking. Source: over 2 years ago

Pattern.css mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Pattern.css yet. Tracking of Pattern.css recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Generative Art in Go and Pattern.css, you can also consider the following products

Tinkersynth - Create and purchase unique generative art

Hero Patterns - A collection of repeatable SVG background patterns

Ramsophone - A generative art/music machine. (Be sure to refresh!)

MagicPattern - The best design toolbox with 10+ tools for anyone

Generart - Generative art tool to create / share / print your patterns

PatternPad - Create beautiful geometric patterns

Loading...