Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

fzy VS XML Copy Editor

Compare fzy VS XML Copy Editor and see what are their differences

Monitask
Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

fzy logo fzy

A better fuzzy finder

XML Copy Editor logo XML Copy Editor

XML Copy Editor is a fast, free, validating XML editor.
  • fzy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-28
  • XML Copy Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-12

fzy features and specs

  • Speed
    Fzy is designed for speed and performance, making it one of the fastest fuzzy text selectors. It's capable of handling large lists with minimal delay.
  • Simplicity
    Fzy has a simple and straightforward interface that focuses solely on fuzzy finding, without unnecessary complexity or additional features.
  • Accuracy
    Fzy ranks matches according to their quality, ensuring that the most relevant results are presented first. This improves the accuracy of selections.
  • Lightweight
    With a small footprint, fzy is lightweight and doesn't burden the system. It's ideal for use in scripts and environments with limited resources.
  • Terminal Integration
    Fzy is optimized for terminal usage, allowing seamless integration into various shell workflows and terminal-based applications.

Possible disadvantages of fzy

  • Limited Features
    Fzy's minimalistic design means it lacks some advanced features found in other fuzzy finders, such as file previews or integration with graphical interfaces.
  • Configuration Options
    Fzy offers limited customization options, which might be a downside for users needing intricate personalization or additional functionality.
  • Learning Curve
    While fzy is simple, users accustomed to more feature-rich fuzzy finders might face a learning curve adapting to its stripped-down nature.
  • Dependency Requirements
    Although lightweight, fzy may still require certain dependencies to be installed on some systems, complicating its setup for non-technical users.

XML Copy Editor features and specs

  • Open Source
    XML Copy Editor is open source, which means it is available for free and allows users to modify and distribute the software according to their needs.
  • Validation
    It offers validation support for XML against DTDs and XML schemas, ensuring that the XML documents are properly structured and error-free.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The editor provides a straightforward and easy-to-navigate interface, which is ideal for beginners and experienced users alike.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    XML Copy Editor is compatible with multiple operating systems including Windows and Linux, offering versatility to users across different platforms.
  • XSLT Support
    It includes support for XSLT, allowing transformations of XML documents into other formats.

Possible disadvantages of XML Copy Editor

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more advanced XML editors like Oxygen XML Editor, XML Copy Editor can be limited in functionalities, which might not meet the needs of all professional users.
  • Outdated UI
    The user interface, while functional, may appear dated compared to modern software, which could impact usability and appeal.
  • Lack of Active Development
    The software does not have frequent updates or active development, which might lead to issues with bug fixes or support for newer XML technologies.
  • Windows Focus
    Although it is cross-platform, the primary focus seems to be on the Windows version, which may result in less optimized experiences on other operating systems.
  • Limited File Format Support
    Support is focused on XML, and it offers limited compatibility with other file formats, which might be a drawback for users working with diverse data types.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to fzy and XML Copy Editor)

fzy

XML Copy Editor

Note Taking
100 100%
Note Taking
0% 0
Task Management
0 0%
Task Management
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using fzy and XML Copy Editor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fzy seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

fzy mentions (4)

  • GNOME 44
    > it supports my keystrokes You know that there is basically a standard set, imposed by Windows in about 1986 or something and also supported in GNOME 2, MATE, Xfce, LXDE, etc etc.? I am more interested in if it supports them. I mean, I don't know what your set are, and I am not for a moment saying there's anything wrong with them, but there are standards for this stuff, used heavily by millions of blind... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Your favourite Rust CLI utilities this year?
    I've been mostly using fzy which is written in C. I hope skim's matching algorithm is as good as fzy's…. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Fzf – a command-line fuzzy finder
    Am I the only one who prefers FZY ? https://github.com/jhawthorn/fzy. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Looking for a neat Neovim config for wilder.nvim
    A while ago there was a post on this sub about a plugin called wilder.nvim which looks absolutely awesome. Wilder seems super configurable and it's README has a bunch of different suggested configurations. However, it is designed to work with both Vim and Neovim, but does have a config for Neovim, but it depends on kinda odd plugins like cpsm (which uses ctrlp.vim) as well as fzy. Source: almost 4 years ago

XML Copy Editor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of XML Copy Editor yet. Tracking of XML Copy Editor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing fzy and XML Copy Editor, you can also consider the following products

fzf - A command-line fuzzy finder written in Go

Altova XMLSpy - The XMLSpy XML Editor is a powerful tool for editing XML and related technologies. It is the only XML Editor with patented SmartFix validation, enterprise-grade editors, converters, debuggers, and code generators.

skim (fuzzy finder) - Discover open source libraries, modules and frameworks you can use in your code

Oxygen XML Editor - Oxygen XML Editor provides a comprehensive suite of XML authoring and development tools.

hf - Health First is a fully integrated delivery network (IDN) providing exceptional healthcare on Florida's Space Coast.

Liquid Studio - XML Tools Provider: XML Studio - Graphical XML Schema Editor.

Loading...