Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

fx VS File Commander

Compare fx VS File Commander and see what are their differences

fx logo fx

Command-line JSON processing tool

File Commander logo File Commander

File Commander for OS/2, Win32 and Linux. Norton Commander(tm) style file manager
  • fx Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23
  • File Commander Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-20

fx features and specs

  • Interactive JSON Viewer
    fx provides an interactive command-line JSON viewer that allows users to explore and manipulate JSON data intuitively.
  • Simple and Lightweight
    The tool is compact and easy to use, making it an excellent choice for users who need quick data examination without complex setup.
  • Scriptable
    Users can use JavaScript expressions to filter and transform JSON data, offering flexibility in data manipulation.
  • Integration
    fx can be easily integrated into shell scripts and other command-line tools due to its standard input/output operations.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Being a Node.js-based tool, fx is cross-platform and can run on multiple operating systems supporting Node.js.

Possible disadvantages of fx

  • Limited Functionality
    fx is designed primarily for viewing and transforming JSON, so it may not have advanced features found in full-fledged data processing tools.
  • JavaScript Requirement
    Users need to be familiar with JavaScript to effectively use fx's data transformation features, which might be a barrier for non-programmers.
  • Command-Line Only
    As a command-line tool, fx lacks a graphical user interface, which might be less appealing for users who prefer visual data interaction.
  • Performance
    Handling very large JSON files may lead to performance issues, as fx is primarily built for lightweight quick tasks.

File Commander features and specs

  • User Friendly Interface
    File Commander offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making file management accessible even for beginners.
  • Robust File Management
    Provides comprehensive file management features including copy, move, delete, and more, facilitating efficient organization of files and directories.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Available for various operating systems, ensuring functionality across different platforms and devices.
  • Highly Configurable
    Offers extensive configuration options allowing users to customize the tool to fit their specific workflow needs.
  • Built-in Tools
    Includes built-in tools such as file viewers and editors, providing users with additional functionality without needing third-party applications.

Possible disadvantages of File Commander

  • Outdated Website and Design
    The website and design may appear outdated, which might deter some users accustomed to modern software aesthetics.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic features are easy to use, advanced options may have a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with complex file operations.
  • Limited Support and Documentation
    There's limited support and user documentation available, making it difficult for users to resolve potential issues independently.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Some users might experience compatibility issues on newer operating systems due to the software's age and update frequency.
  • Lack of Cloud Integration
    Unlike some modern file managers, it does not offer built-in integration with cloud storage services, limiting its functionality for users relying heavily on cloud solutions.

fx videos

Suzuki FX | Suzuki Alto First Generation: Owner Review: Price, Specs & Features | PakWheels

More videos:

  • Review - Numark Mixtrack Pro FX & Platinum FX Review - The best new DJ controllers for beginners?
  • Review - The PC-FX - Review - Game Sack

File Commander videos

File Commander App Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to fx and File Commander)
File Manager
64 64%
36% 36
File Explorer
66 66%
34% 34
Tool
35 35%
65% 65
FTP Client
69 69%
31% 31

User comments

Share your experience with using fx and File Commander. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fx seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

fx mentions (20)

View more

File Commander mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of File Commander yet. Tracking of File Commander recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing fx and File Commander, you can also consider the following products

jq - jq is like sed for JSON data - you can use it to slice and filter and map and transform structured...

File Manager File Explorer - File Manager File Explorer is a fully-featured file explorer and app manager to help with file transfer and accessing files and documents.

jello - jello is a command line tool that filters JSON data using pure python syntax.

Moto File Manager - Moto File Manager is an Android application that allows you to manage your files efficiently and easily.

Solid Explorer - Solid Explorer is a powerful Android file manager featuring access to most popular cloud storages, root access and easy extensibility.

X-plore File Manager - X-plore File Manager is a free, all-in-one file manager by Lonely Cat Games.