Projects that require approximate string matching, such as natural language processing applications, data cleaning tasks, and developing user input systems where flexibility in matching is beneficial.
Based on our record, FuzzyWuzzy should be more popular than Parse.ly Analytics. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Do fuzzy matching (something like fuzzywuzzy maybe) to see if the the words line up (allowing for wrong words). You'll need to work out how to use scoring to work out how well aligned the two lists are. Source: over 2 years ago
Convert the original lines to full furigana and do a fuzzy match. (For reference, the original line is 貴方がこれまでに得てきた力、存分に発揮してくださいね。) You can do a regional search using the initial scene data (E60) first, and if the confidence is low, go for a slower full search. Source: over 2 years ago
It's now known as "thefuzz", see https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy. Source: about 3 years ago
You can have a look at this library to use fuzzy search instead of looking for plaintext muck: https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy. Source: over 3 years ago
To deal with comparing the string, I found FuzzyWuzzy ratio function that is returning a score of how much the strings are similar from 0-100. Source: almost 4 years ago
I've also seen parse.ly pop up a bit, I might try it to see if it's any decent. Source: over 2 years ago
Parse.ly | Python Data Engineers (NA) & Machine Learning Engineers (EU) | Remote | Full-Time | https://parse.ly Are you a Python programmer based in North or South America, interested in large-scale data processing (terabytes per month, petabytes in our archive), and making use of massively-parallel computing architectures, such as those behind Spark and Dask? Or, are you a Machine Learning Engineer in Western or... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
Would be really useful (not to mention polite) if sources were cited when you do this. For example, I think the early points are from the parse.ly report. People might want to click through for context if you let them. Source: about 4 years ago
Amazon Comprehend - Discover insights and relationships in text
GoSquared People Analytics - One place to understand your users
spaCy - spaCy is a library for advanced natural language processing in Python and Cython.
Make My Persona - A free buyer persona generator
Google Cloud Natural Language API - Natural language API using Google machine learning
Currents by Parse.ly - Uncover what’s making 1 billion people pay attention