Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Fusion.js VS PDFShift

Compare Fusion.js VS PDFShift and see what are their differences

Fusion.js logo Fusion.js

A modular Javascript framework for creating plugin-based React applications.

PDFShift logo PDFShift

Convert any HTML documents to high-fidelity PDF using a single POST request
  • Fusion.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-21
  • PDFShift Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-03-07

A powerful, fast and high-fidelity HTML to PDF conversion API.

Code examples and package ready for Node, Python and PHP developers.

Advanced features are available, including watermarking and encryption!

PDFShift

$ Details
freemium $9.0 / Monthly (500 conversions and up to 5Mb per generated PDF.)
Release Date
2018 May

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fusion.js and PDFShift)
Application And Data
100 100%
0% 0
HTML To PDF
0 0%
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
PDF Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fusion.js and PDFShift. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Fusion.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fusion.js mentions (3)

  • [AskJS] question about your monorepo workflow
    b) Don't do intermediate builds at all. This is what we do for monorepo-internal packages at Uber. Basically, our framework lets you specify what parts of node_modules should be transpiled when compiling the service. So basically you just have a single compilation step and the performance cost is alleviated by leveraging babel cache. The upside of this approach is you only need one file watching daemon and you... Source: over 2 years ago
  • [AskJS] Best practices for polyfills in libraries?
    I also worked on another framework which does ship with polyfills, but this one is very much a "we-call-you" framework, in the sense that it has an full-fledged, opinionated compiler with hundreds of hours worth of time spent on optimizations, and the inclusion of polyfills is also very much a deliberate choice made in the name of productivity. Source: over 2 years ago
  • [AskJS] Is it just me or is core-js fundamentally broken?
    We've gone down this rabbit hole with Fusion.js. The TL;DR: is core.js aims to be standard-compliant, which means it'll often pull in a lot of code to deal with obscure corner cases like dealing w/ Symbols. Source: about 3 years ago

PDFShift mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PDFShift yet. Tracking of PDFShift recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fusion.js and PDFShift, you can also consider the following products

Browse Happy - Presents the user with a list of the most popular modern browsers with links to download the latest version of each.

DocRaptor - As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more