Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FullCalendar VS BrowserStack

Compare FullCalendar VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

FullCalendar logo FullCalendar

FullCalendar is an open-source JavaScript event calendar.

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • FullCalendar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999

FullCalendar features and specs

  • Comprehensive Features
    FullCalendar offers a wide range of features like drag-and-drop event management, customizable views (month, week, day), recurring events, and timezone support.
  • Extensibility
    The library is highly extensible with various plugins and options to add additional functionalities like Google Calendar integration and resource management.
  • Responsive Design
    FullCalendar is built with a responsive design in mind, ensuring that the calendar looks good and operates smoothly on both desktop and mobile devices.
  • Documentation
    FullCalendar offers comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and examples that help developers understand how to implement and customize the calendar.
  • Community Support
    It has a robust community and active support forums, making it easier to find solutions to common problems and share customization tips.
  • Performance
    Optimized for fast rendering and efficient use of resources, ensuring high performance even with a large number of events.

Possible disadvantages of FullCalendar

  • Complexity
    Due to its extensive feature set, FullCalendar can be complex to implement and may require a steep learning curve, especially for beginners.
  • Cost
    While the core library is free, some advanced features and plugins require a paid license, which might be a constraint for small projects or individual developers.
  • Customization Overhead
    Highly specific customizations can be cumbersome, requiring detailed changes and in-depth knowledge of the library's API.
  • Browser Compatibility
    Though generally robust, some users have reported issues with browser-specific bugs, requiring additional testing and fixes.
  • Dependency Management
    FullCalendar relies on other libraries like Moment.js (though moving away from it), which can lead to dependency management issues in larger projects.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

FullCalendar videos

Episode #042 - FullCalendar Events and Scheduling

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FullCalendar and BrowserStack)
Appointments and Scheduling
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Appointment Scheduling
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FullCalendar and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FullCalendar and BrowserStack

FullCalendar Reviews

We have no reviews of FullCalendar yet.
Be the first one to post

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FullCalendar should be more popular than BrowserStack. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FullCalendar mentions (15)

  • Frontend Libraries for Your Next Project
    FullCalendar is an exhaustive calendar library offering extensive customization options. It supports features like dragging, resizing, and event handling, making it ideal for scheduling applications. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Is Temporal still temporal?
    The only complexity with Temporal is the size of the polyfill. However, an alternative polyfill has been in development for some time now — temporal-polyfill by FullCalendar. Its size is much more appealing: 60.7 kB to 21.7 kB (gzip). And I plan to use it in my next project! How about you? - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Page-specific javascript in 2023
    I looked at Stimulus, but it just isn't clear how it's supposed to replace what I'm doing with jQuery on each page. Or javascript libraries like fullcalendar.io. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Best Scheduling Libraries for Frontend Developers
    FullCalendar is a JavaScript calendar library and can be integrated with frontend frameworks, such as React, Vue.js, and Angular. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier
    Hey guys. On the struggle bus trying to use FullCalendar.io's code, to pull an .ics and display. Its complaining about an Unexpected Identifier trying to import a function from a .js file. I cannot for the life of me figure out what exactly it wants. Thoughts? Ideas? Source: about 2 years ago
View more

BrowserStack mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FullCalendar and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

Doodle - Make meetings happen. With Doodle, scheduling becomes quick and easy.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Dudle - Dudle is an online scheduling application, which is free and open source.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Framadate - Make your polls

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.