Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Fping (open source) VS redsocks

Compare Fping (open source) VS redsocks and see what are their differences

Fping (open source) logo Fping (open source)

fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.

redsocks logo redsocks

Redsocks is a daemon running on the local system, that will transparently tunnel any TCP connection...
  • Fping (open source) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-14
  • redsocks Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-09

Fping (open source) features and specs

  • Speed
    Fping is designed to send out multiple ICMP Echo Requests in parallel, allowing it to quickly scan large numbers of hosts compared to traditional ping commands.
  • Scripting Friendly
    Fping is suitable for use in shell scripts due to its output format, making it useful for automated network monitoring and management tasks.
  • IPv4 and IPv6 Support
    Fping supports both IPv4 and IPv6, providing flexibility for various network environments.
  • Customizable Options
    It offers a wide range of options for setting the number of pings, intervals, and timing, allowing users to tailor the tool to suit specific needs.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Fping consumes fewer system resources compared to some GUI-based network tools, making it ideal for running on servers and low-power devices.

Possible disadvantages of Fping (open source)

  • Command-Line Interface Only
    Fping does not have a graphical user interface, which may make it less accessible to users who are not familiar with command-line operations.
  • Advanced Configuration Complexity
    While it is highly configurable, the range of options and parameters can be overwhelming for new users who may not have a deep understanding of networking.
  • Limited To Echo Requests
    Fping is designed specifically for ICMP Echo Requests, limiting its usefulness for scenarios that require more in-depth network diagnostics.
  • Lack of Built-In Analysis
    Unlike some more comprehensive network monitoring tools, Fping does not include features for detailed analysis and visualization of network data.
  • Potential Security Restrictions
    Some networks may have security policies that restrict the use of ICMP packets, which could limit Fping's effectiveness or even prevent it from functioning.

redsocks features and specs

  • Transparent Proxying
    Redsocks allows for transparent proxying of any TCP connection, which means it can forward traffic without requiring any changes to the application.
  • Integration with IPTables
    It works in conjunction with IPTables, enabling you to redirect traffic easily for specific applications or networks.
  • Versatile Network Support
    Redsocks supports various proxy types, including SOCKS4, SOCKS5, and HTTP CONNECT, making it versatile in different network environments.
  • Open Source
    Redsocks is open source, which means it can be freely used and modified, fostering community involvement and transparency.

Possible disadvantages of redsocks

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up Redsocks can be complicated, particularly for users unfamiliar with network configurations and IPTables.
  • Limited Documentation
    The documentation for Redsocks can be sparse or outdated, which may pose challenges for new users seeking to troubleshoot or optimize their setup.
  • Performance Overhead
    Redirecting through proxies can introduce latency and performance overhead, potentially affecting speed-dependent applications.
  • Security Risks
    If not configured correctly, it could expose sensitive data or be improperly safeguarded, leading to security vulnerabilities.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fping (open source) and redsocks)
Monitoring Tools
77 77%
23% 23
Security & Privacy
0 0%
100% 100
Security
100 100%
0% 0
Web Scraping
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fping (open source) and redsocks. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, redsocks seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fping (open source) mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fping (open source) yet. Tracking of Fping (open source) recommendations started around Mar 2021.

redsocks mentions (1)

  • Freelance request: NYM -> Tor connection chaining for Whonix Workstation qube
    Building ubuntu 20 template qube as NYM is tested on it by devs; apt update && apt upgrade -y, then apt install redsocks, then wget current version of nym-socks5-client from nymtech github, chmod 777 it. All in a template. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fping (open source) and redsocks, you can also consider the following products

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

Proxifier - Proxifier extends the advantages of a proxy server to network applications that don't natively support it.

PingInfoView - PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.

Proxycap - ProxyCap empowers you to divert your PC’s system associations through intermediary servers.

Open Nettest - Open Nettest is a platform for collecting, processing and visualizing data related QoS and QoE.

Wide Cap - WideCap - is system proxifier. It was created as `extended` version of FreeCap program.