Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
F

Fping (open source) VS IPerf2

Compare Fping (open source) VS IPerf2 and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Fping (open source) logo Fping (open source)

fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.

IPerf2 logo IPerf2

A network traffic tool for measuring TCP and UDP performance with metrics around both throughput and latency.
  • Fping (open source) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-14
  • IPerf2 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-20

Fping (open source) features and specs

  • Speed
    Fping is designed to send out multiple ICMP Echo Requests in parallel, allowing it to quickly scan large numbers of hosts compared to traditional ping commands.
  • Scripting Friendly
    Fping is suitable for use in shell scripts due to its output format, making it useful for automated network monitoring and management tasks.
  • IPv4 and IPv6 Support
    Fping supports both IPv4 and IPv6, providing flexibility for various network environments.
  • Customizable Options
    It offers a wide range of options for setting the number of pings, intervals, and timing, allowing users to tailor the tool to suit specific needs.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Fping consumes fewer system resources compared to some GUI-based network tools, making it ideal for running on servers and low-power devices.

Possible disadvantages of Fping (open source)

  • Command-Line Interface Only
    Fping does not have a graphical user interface, which may make it less accessible to users who are not familiar with command-line operations.
  • Advanced Configuration Complexity
    While it is highly configurable, the range of options and parameters can be overwhelming for new users who may not have a deep understanding of networking.
  • Limited To Echo Requests
    Fping is designed specifically for ICMP Echo Requests, limiting its usefulness for scenarios that require more in-depth network diagnostics.
  • Lack of Built-In Analysis
    Unlike some more comprehensive network monitoring tools, Fping does not include features for detailed analysis and visualization of network data.
  • Potential Security Restrictions
    Some networks may have security policies that restrict the use of ICMP packets, which could limit Fping's effectiveness or even prevent it from functioning.

IPerf2 features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fping (open source) and IPerf2)

Fping (open source)

IPerf2

Monitoring Tools
88 88%
Monitoring Tools
12% 12
Network & Admin
0 0%
Network & Admin
100% 100
OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0
Security
100 100%
Security
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Fping (open source) and IPerf2. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, IPerf2 seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fping (open source) mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fping (open source) yet. Tracking of Fping (open source) recommendations started around Mar 2021.

IPerf2 mentions (3)

  • WAN circuit testing
    I think such a tool is fairly straightforward to develop with iperf 2 as the underlying src/sink. The man page has new features including start times & permit keys. Active, low duty-cycle, low impact telemetry has been a goal. The idea is that someone else would develop a web app and host public servers. As an iperf 2 maintainer, I'm trying to remain arm's length from such products but I do think the industry... Source: over 2 years ago
  • WAN circuit testing
    Iperf 2 can help and has many new tests including one way delay, low duty cycle burst, tcp bouncback, etc. More on the man page. OWD does required clock sync. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Is iPerf test an officially approved RFC 2544 test?
    A bit of a tangent, but there are a lot of new features in iperf 2, much are around latency or one way delay (OWD). Many times these days it's latency that affects the quality of experience to end users. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fping (open source) and IPerf2, you can also consider the following products

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

Ostinato - Ostinato is a packet crafter and traffic generator for network engineers. Wireshark in Reverse!

Open Nettest - Open Nettest is a platform for collecting, processing and visualizing data related QoS and QoE.

Nipper - Nipper - Neat Internet Protocol Packet EditoR - is a graphical packet generation tool.

PingInfoView - PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.

packeth - packeth is GUI and CLI packet generator tool for ethernet.

Loading...