Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Foxpass VS Cyberark

Compare Foxpass VS Cyberark and see what are their differences

ComplyCube
Verify your customers in under 15 seconds anywhere in the world with a cutting-edge SaaS & API platform for Identity Verification and AML/KYC compliance. featured
This page does not exist
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Foxpass logo Foxpass

Foxpass manages users, groups, and SSH keys (plus a LDAP and RADIUS interfaces) to increase an organization's server and network security.

Cyberark logo Cyberark

Security for the Heart of the Enterprise
  • Foxpass Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • Cyberark Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

Foxpass features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Foxpass has a user-friendly interface that simplifies the management of users, enabling quick setup and easy navigation.
  • Integration
    Foxpass integrates seamlessly with a variety of platforms like AWS, Google Cloud, and popular directory services, allowing smoother transitions and improved functionality.
  • Security
    It provides strong security features such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) and SSH key management, which significantly enhance the security posture of an organization.
  • Scalability
    Foxpass can easily scale with an organization, accommodating more users and more complex setups as the business grows.
  • 24/7 Support
    Provides around-the-clock support to assist with any issues or questions that may arise, ensuring minimal downtime and quick resolution of problems.
  • Automation
    Offers automation for common administrative tasks, reducing the workload for IT staff and minimizing the risk of human error.

Possible disadvantages of Foxpass

  • Cost
    Foxpass can be more expensive than some other user management and authentication solutions, which might be a concern for smaller businesses with tighter budgets.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While generally easy to use, some advanced features might require a steeper learning curve or more technical knowledge to implement effectively.
  • Limited Customization
    The platform may have limited customization options, restricting the ability to tailor specific features to meet unique business needs.
  • Dependency
    Relying heavily on a third-party service like Foxpass for critical security features can be risky if the service experiences any downtime or issues.
  • Integration Issues
    Although it integrates with many platforms, there might be occasional issues or limitations with specific integrations, requiring additional troubleshooting.
  • Learning Curve
    New users or teams not familiar with centralized user management systems might experience a learning curve, necessitating training or a period of adjustment.

Cyberark features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security
    CyberArk provides robust protection for privileged accounts, reducing the risk of cyber attacks and insider threats.
  • End-to-End Solution
    The platform offers a complete suite for privileged access management, from password vaulting to session monitoring and threat analytics.
  • Scalability
    CyberArk's solution is scalable and can meet the needs of both small businesses and large enterprises.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    The platform helps organizations meet various regulatory requirements like GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS by securing privileged access.
  • User Experience
    CyberArk has a user-friendly interface that simplifies the management of privileged credentials and access.

Possible disadvantages of Cyberark

  • Cost
    CyberArk is often considered a premium solution and can be expensive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity
    The extensive features and customization options can make the initial setup and ongoing management complex.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive capabilities, there is a significant learning curve for new users and administrators.
  • Integration Challenges
    While CyberArk does offer many integrations, there can be difficulties when aligning it with some specific or legacy systems.
  • Support
    Some users have reported slower-than-expected response times from customer support, which can be critical in resolving issues promptly.

Analysis of Foxpass

Overall verdict

  • Foxpass is generally considered a reliable tool for businesses looking to enhance their security protocols, especially for companies utilizing cloud services. It can help reduce the administrative burden of managing user access and improve overall organizational security. However, its suitability may vary depending on specific company needs and existing infrastructure.

Why this product is good

  • Foxpass is a service designed to enhance security by providing cloud-based identity and access management solutions. It helps organizations manage user accounts and access privileges seamlessly, integrating with various existing systems like LDAP and RADIUS. With features like multi-factor authentication, audit logs, and SSH key management, Foxpass aims to secure infrastructures and streamline user access management.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses aiming to improve access management.
  • Companies already using cloud-based infrastructures that need seamless integration with identity management solutions.
  • Organizations looking for a straightforward tool to implement multi-factor authentication.

Foxpass videos

No Foxpass videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cyberark videos

+ Add

CyberArk Basic Operation Tasks Introduction

More videos:

  • Review - CyberArk Privileged Account Security Overview

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Foxpass and Cyberark)

Foxpass

Cyberark

Identity And Access Management
64 64%
Identity And Access Management
36% 36
Security & Privacy
0 0%
Security & Privacy
100% 100
Identity Provider
100 100%
Identity Provider
0% 0
Password Management
41 41%
Password Management
59% 59

User comments

Share your experience with using Foxpass and Cyberark. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Foxpass and Cyberark

Foxpass Reviews

We have no reviews of Foxpass yet.
Be the first one to post

Cyberark Reviews

Top 10 Best SAML Identity Providers List for SSO (Pros and Cons)
As a result CyberArk is a perfect solution for SMEs (small to medium enterprises), as it significantly protects your infrastructure from falling prey to compromised login credentials.
Source: cloudinfrastructureservices.co.uk

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Foxpass and Cyberark, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft Azure Active Directory - Azure Active Directory is a comprehensive identity and access management cloud solution that provides a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups and help secure access to applications including Microsoft online services like Office 365 …

KeePass - KeePass is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file.

JumpCloud - Cloud-based directory services. Alternative to Microsoft Active Directory.

Dashlane - Dashlane is a secure way to bypass tedious logins, forms, and purchases online. Save all of your information and save time in your online transactions.

OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more

1Password - 1Password can create strong, unique passwords for you, remember them, and restore them, all directly in your web browser.

Loading...