Four Minute Books VS Stack Overflow Trends

Four Minute Books: https://fourminutebooks.com/ Looking for a massive library of book synopses? Look no further than Four Minute Books by Nik. He goes the extra mile by summarizing books from the Blinkist app and distilling them into three significant lessons, along with his personal takeaway. If you want a quick yet comprehensive summary of "Traction" with additional insights, Four Minute Books is the place to be. Source: 10 months ago

Not GP, but https://fourminutebooks.com comes to mind. It's also just incredibly useful to get a "4 minute precis" and decide whether or not it's worth it to you to spend more time on that book. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

I stared by googling consciousness 101 on Google and YouTube than form there I read Bentov books and some of the books on these lists https://dennislehanebooks.com/best-books-on-consciousness/ and https://thedailyidea.org/best-books-consciousness/ you can use https://fourminutebooks.com to give you a book idea from some of these books in 4 minutes. Source: over 1 year ago

Often I read book summary or two before I dive into it. So I know what to expect. There are many good sites such as fourminutebooks.com or samuelthomasdavies.com. Source: over 2 years ago

And in case you like it as such: https://fourminutebooks.com. Source: over 2 years ago

It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

> In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

> Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago