Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register   |   Login

FNT DCIM Software VS Puppet

Compare FNT DCIM Software VS Puppet and see what are their differences


FNT's Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) solution is the central management and optimization software for data centers. From the building infrastructure down to the services , this DCIM enables a comprehensive view of DC resources.

Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.
FNT DCIM Software Landing Page
FNT DCIM Software Landing Page
Puppet Landing Page
Puppet Landing Page

FNT DCIM Software details

Categories
Monitoring Tools Product Deployment Log Management
Website fntsoftware.com  
Pricing URL-
Details $-
Platforms
-
Release Date-

Puppet details

Categories
Product Deployment Other Infrastructure Tools Build Tools
Website puppet.com  
Pricing URL-
Details $-
Platforms
-
Release Date-

FNT DCIM Software videos

No FNT DCIM Software videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Puppet videos

Sml merch Jeffy puppet review and more

More videos:

  • - Muppet Whatnot Workshop Puppet Review...(Kinda)

Category Popularity beta

0-100% (relative to FNT DCIM Software and Puppet)
100
100%
0%
0
3
3%
97%
97
100
100%
0%
0

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FNT DCIM Software and Puppet

FNT DCIM Software Reviews

We have no reviews of FNT DCIM Software yet.
Be the first one to post

Puppet Reviews

Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible
Puppet follows a master-agent or master-slave architecture. In the case of Puppet’s architecture, the master machine serves as the platform for running the Puppet server. The client machines provide the platforms for running Puppet clients as agents. In addition, the requirement of signing a certificate between the master machine and the agent adds complexity. Therefore,...
Why we use Terraform and not Chef, Puppet, Ansible, SaltStack, or CloudFormation
Once again, Chef, Puppet, and SaltStack do have varying levels of support for agentless modes (e.g., salt-ssh), but these often feel like they were tacked on as an afterthought and don’t always support the full feature set of the configuration management tool. That’s why in the wild, the default or idiomatic configuration for Chef, Puppet, and SaltStack almost always...
Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack: Which Works Best For You?
Puppet – Puppet also has a master-agent architecture. Puppet server runs on the master machine and Puppet clients runs as an agent on each client machine. After that, there is also a certificate signing between the agent and the master. Therefore, it is also not that easy.
Source: www.edureka.co
Ansible overtakes Chef and Puppet as the top cloud configuration management tool
Breaking these results down year-over-year, use of Ansible grew from 36% in 2018 to 41% in 2019—surpassing Chef, which grew from 36% to 37%, as well as Puppet, which grew from 34% to 37%. Rounding out the list is Terraform, which experienced a jump from 20% to 31%, and Salt, which increased in usage from 13% to 18%.
Terraform vs. Ansible vs. Puppet
Puppet Forge is a vast repo of modules to do everything from configuring logrotate.d to installing MongoDB, to hardening an Ubuntu server with CIS benchmarks. Puppet’s User Groups, Slack, and IRC are deep and developed, and this is a good landing page for their community content.
Source: logz.io

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FNT DCIM Software and Puppet, you can also consider the following products

DCImanager - DCImanager is a platform for managing physical equipment. Connect any physical equipment to a single platform. Use the platform to manage your servers, switches, PDU as well as physical and virtual networks.

Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.

User comments

Share your experience with using FNT DCIM Software and Puppet. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Add Comment