Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Floobits VS CodeFactor.io

Compare Floobits VS CodeFactor.io and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Floobits logo Floobits

Floobits brings real-time collaborative editing to text editors, IDEs, and now Atom.

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
  • Floobits Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-02
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

Floobits features and specs

  • Real-time Collaboration
    Floobits allows multiple developers to work on the same code simultaneously, facilitating real-time collaboration similar to Google Docs but for code.
  • Cross-platform Support
    Floobits is compatible with various operating systems and can be integrated with several code editors like Sublime Text, Atom, and IntelliJ IDEA, providing a wide range of user options.
  • Seamless Editor Integration
    Floobits integrates seamlessly with popular code editors, providing a natural development experience without forcing users to switch tools or workflows.
  • Text and Voice Chat
    It includes text and voice chat features, enabling efficient communication between collaborators directly within the tool.
  • Project Sharing
    Users can easily share projects and collaborate without needing to manually set up development environments for their peers.

Possible disadvantages of Floobits

  • Dependency on Internet
    Floobits requires a stable internet connection for real-time collaboration, which can be limiting in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Pricing Structure
    While it offers a free version, advanced features and increased workspace require a paid subscription, which might not be feasible for all users.
  • Limited Editor Support
    Although it supports a good number of editors, users of less-known or unsupported editors might find it difficult to integrate Floobits into their workflows.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve when initially setting up and using Floobits, especially those unfamiliar with collaborative coding tools.
  • Security Concerns
    As with any cloud-based tool, there might be concerns about data security and ownership when using third-party services for collaborative coding.

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

Analysis of CodeFactor.io

Overall verdict

  • CodeFactor.io is generally considered a good tool for developers seeking to improve code quality and streamline the code review process. Its ease of use and integration capabilities make it a valuable asset for both individual developers and teams.

Why this product is good

  • CodeFactor.io is a tool that provides automated code review for GitHub projects.
  • It helps developers maintain high code quality by automatically identifying issues in their code.
  • The platform supports multiple programming languages and integrates easily into a developer's workflow with GitHub.
  • It provides detailed insights and suggestions on how to fix the identified issues, which can save time for developers and maintain consistent code quality.

Recommended for

  • Individual developers looking to automate their code review process.
  • Development teams seeking to maintain consistent code quality.
  • Open-source project maintainers who want to ensure their codebase remains in good shape.
  • Organizations looking to integrate automated code analysis into their continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines.

Floobits videos

+ Add

Pair programming on ag with Floobits+Atom

More videos:

  • Review - DÉVELOPPER À PLUSIEURS SUR INTELLIJ ! (Floobits)

CodeFactor.io videos

+ Add

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Floobits and CodeFactor.io)

Floobits

CodeFactor.io

IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
Code Coverage
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0
Code Quality
0 0%
Code Quality
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Floobits and CodeFactor.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Floobits seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Floobits mentions (6)

  • Zed is now open source
    Isn't that what Floobits is? https://floobits.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Pair programming between neovim and Webstorm
    Think this might be what you want. Https://floobits.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to collaborate code?
    Floobits. Works with a lot of editors. Https://floobits.com/. Source: about 3 years ago
  • How to collaborate code?
    I have noticed Floobits which is a collaborative editing service. It integrates with a number of editors including neovim. What I like about that idea is that each participant can use their preferred editor with their preferred settings. I haven't gotten it running - when I tried there was a python dependency mismatch or something that I wasn't motivated to investigate. I might try again before the next time I... Source: about 3 years ago
  • Collaborative editing on (n)vim ?
    I think Floobits is still a thing and supports neovim. Bonus is that it works across a couple different editors as well. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

CodeFactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeFactor.io yet. Tracking of CodeFactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Floobits and CodeFactor.io, you can also consider the following products

Codassium - A better way to conduct remote interviews. Collaborative code editor + video conferencing + code execution = Awesome interviews.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

codebunk - Realtime Collaborative Editor with Code Execution, REPLs and Chat

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

CodeTogether - Live share IDEs and coding sessions. See changes in real time.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

Loading...