Software Alternatives & Reviews

FitNesse VS ReQtest

Compare FitNesse VS ReQtest and see what are their differences

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

ReQtest logo ReQtest

ReQtest is an end to end solution for test management, bug tracking, requirement management and agile project management.
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • ReQtest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20

ReQtest is a test management tool which offers comprehensive quality assurance. It is recommended by Test Managers with over 11,000 users in 20+ countries. It helps testing teams in managing test priorities and achieving testing objectives while overcoming any testing challenges.

FitNesse videos

No FitNesse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

ReQtest videos

ReQtest Test management tutorial

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and ReQtest)
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
QA
12 12%
88% 88
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Error Tracking
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and ReQtest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

ReQtest mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ReQtest yet. Tracking of ReQtest recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and ReQtest, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

DevTest - Test management solution for efficient quality assurance

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Zephyr - Zephyr is a small real-time operating system for connected, resource-constrained devices supporting...

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

CloudQA - CloudQA is a testing automation platform for web application which allows to build reliable, code less, reusable cross-browser test cases for effective test automation.