Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FitNesse VS QATestLab

Compare FitNesse VS QATestLab and see what are their differences

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

QATestLab logo QATestLab

QATestLab is independent software testing provider. Wide range of software testing types and solution for improving software quality
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • QATestLab Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

FitNesse

Pricing URL
-
$ Details

QATestLab

$ Details
-
Startup details
Country
Ukraine
City
Kiev
Employees
100 - 249

FitNesse videos

No FitNesse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

QATestLab videos

QATestLab Mobile Application Testing

More videos:

  • Review - Company Profile QATestLab

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and QATestLab)
Testing
69 69%
31% 31
Software Testing
35 35%
65% 65
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and QATestLab. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

QATestLab mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QATestLab yet. Tracking of QATestLab recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and QATestLab, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Qualitest - Qualitest - the world’s largest Independent software testing & Quality Assurance Service company.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Kyrio - Kyrio | Know Your Retail Inside Out

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Gadgeon - Home Automation services in Kerala, India with most trusted dealers with years of experience, we assure customer satisfaction for all our products.