Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

FitNesse VS QARA Test

Compare FitNesse VS QARA Test and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

QARA Test logo QARA Test

QARA Test is a platform that enables users to reduce their testing efforts and accelerate their testing capability.
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • QARA Test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-08-11

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and QARA Test)

FitNesse

QARA Test

Testing
60 60%
Testing
40% 40
Project Management
0 0%
Project Management
100% 100
Automated Testing
100 100%
Automated Testing
0% 0
QA
37 37%
QA
63% 63

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and QARA Test. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

QARA Test mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QARA Test yet. Tracking of QARA Test recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and QARA Test, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Tap2Trade - Tap2Trade is a cloud-based sourcing and procurement tool that helps in maximizing the spend visibility and savings, while it helps to spend management.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

ServiceTree - ServiceTree is a platform that enables users to scale their business and improve their bottom line by fulfilling the expectation of customers.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Testomatio - Testomat.io — Test Management System for automated tests. A powerful solution to keep and sync your automated and manual tests in one place, provides to make testing activities completely visible and transparent for all teammates Dev, PM, BA

Loading...