Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

FitNesse VS Parrot QA

Compare FitNesse VS Parrot QA and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

Parrot QA logo Parrot QA

Automate your bug testing without writing a line of code.
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • Parrot QA Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-18

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and Parrot QA)

FitNesse

Parrot QA

Automated Testing
100 100%
Automated Testing
0% 0
QA
11 11%
QA
89% 89
Testing
100 100%
Testing
0% 0
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and Parrot QA. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Parrot QA mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Parrot QA yet. Tracking of Parrot QA recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and Parrot QA, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

RainforestQA - Insanely simple testing. Create tests for your website in plain English, then run them across all major browsers with a single click. Powered by human intelligence

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Bitrise - Tens of thousands of agencies, startups and enterprise companies with mobile apps - including Runkeeper, Grindr, Duolingo and more - use Bitrise to automate their way to increased productivity & speed

Loading...