Software Alternatives & Reviews

FitNesse VS Babel

Compare FitNesse VS Babel and see what are their differences

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

Babel logo Babel

Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • Babel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-02

FitNesse videos

No FitNesse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Babel videos

Babel - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Day 16 | Babel Review | 365 Films
  • Review - Worth The Hype? - BABEL Review
  • Review - Book CommuniTEA: Is BABEL a rac1st mani!fest0? [you should know the answer]
  • Review - Babel is a Masterpiece, And Here's Why

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and Babel)
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and Babel. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Babel seems to be a lot more popular than FitNesse. While we know about 134 links to Babel, we've tracked only 3 mentions of FitNesse. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Babel mentions (134)

  • How, and why, you should add JavaScript linting to your project. With ESLint and Gulp
    Some of the most popular JavaScript linting tools are ESLint, JSHint, JSLint and JSCS. We're going to be using ESLint. It’s very flexible, easy to use and has the best ES6 support, which will be helpful if we introduce more modern JavaScript (that will be transpiled for older browsers using https://babeljs.io/). All rules for ESLint can be found here: https://eslint.org/docs/rules/. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • What is Server Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG)?
    This simply extends the existing build process that many front-end frameworks have. After Babel's done with its transpilation, it merely executes code to compile your initial screen into static HTML and CSS. This isn't entirely dissimilar from how SSR hydrates your initial screen, but it's done at compile-time, not at request time. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Storybook 8 Beta
    First, we switched the default compiler for new projects from Babel to SWC (Speedy Web Compiler). SWC is dramatically faster than Babel and requires zero configuration. We’ll continue to support Babel in any project currently using it. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Nuxt vs Next: Which JavaScript Framework Suits Your Next Project?
    Nuxt.js is an open-source JavaScript framework built on Vue.js, Node.js, Vite, and Babel.js used for creating fast, cutting-edge applications. Nuxt.js possesses similar features to Next.js, with the major difference being the web framework it is compatible with. Next.js is a React framework whereas Nuxt.js is a Vue framework. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Abstract Syntax Trees and Practical Applications in JavaScript
    Disclaimer: If you've already developed Babel or ESLint plugins, this article may not be as beneficial for you, as you're likely already familiar with the majority of the content covered here. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and Babel, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Composer - Composer is a tool for dependency management in PHP.