Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

FireSSH VS Persistent SSH

Compare FireSSH VS Persistent SSH and see what are their differences

Unimus
Unimus is a Network Automation and Configuration management (NCM) solution designed for fast deployment network-wide and ease of use. Unimus does not require learning any abstraction or templating languages, and does not require any coding skills. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

FireSSH logo FireSSH

After 13 years and 25 million downloads later, Firefox has officially removed FireFTP and FireSSH support from the browser. Thus, I've ended support / development of the addons. I recommend switching to Waterfox to continue using the addons.

Persistent SSH logo Persistent SSH

Persistent SSH is SSH tunnel manager for a Windows systems.
  • FireSSH Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-02
  • Persistent SSH Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-25

FireSSH features and specs

  • Cross-platform
    FireSSH works on any operating system that supports Firefox, enhancing its flexibility and usability across different environments.
  • Integration with Firefox
    As a Firefox extension, FireSSH eliminates the need for a separate SSH client, making it convenient for users who prefer to work within their browser.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The extension provides a straightforward and easy-to-navigate interface, which can be especially beneficial for users who may not be as comfortable with command-line tools.
  • Free and Open Source
    FireSSH is freely available and open source, allowing users to use and modify it according to their needs without incurring any costs.

Possible disadvantages of FireSSH

  • Dependence on Firefox
    FireSSH requires Firefox to function, limiting its use to only those who are willing or able to use this browser.
  • Performance Limitations
    As a browser extension, FireSSH may suffer from performance limitations and potential instability compared to standalone SSH clients.
  • Security Concerns
    Relying on browser extensions can raise security concerns, especially when handling sensitive SSH credentials within a web browser.
  • Limited Features
    While convenient, FireSSH lacks some advanced features and functionalities that more robust, dedicated SSH clients offer.

Persistent SSH features and specs

  • Reliable Connectivity
    Persistent SSH provides a stable and continuous SSH connection, which is beneficial for applications that require uninterrupted connectivity.
  • Session Management
    It offers robust session management features, allowing users to resume their work seamlessly even after network interruptions.
  • Security Features
    The platform incorporates strong encryption and authentication methods, ensuring secure data transmission over SSH connections.
  • Ease of Use
    Persistent SSH is designed to be user-friendly, making it easy for both technical and non-technical users to establish and maintain SSH connections.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple operating systems, providing flexibility and accessibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Persistent SSH

  • Cost
    The service may involve subscription fees or usage costs, which can be a downside for users looking for free alternatives.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    While it is user-friendly, some initial setup and configuration might be complex for users unfamiliar with SSH or networking concepts.
  • Internet Dependency
    The effectiveness of Persistent SSH relies on internet connectivity, which might pose issues in areas with poor network infrastructure.
  • Limited Features Compared to Alternatives
    Some alternatives might offer more comprehensive features or integrations that are not available with Persistent SSH.
  • Potential Security Risks if Misconfigured
    If not properly configured, there may be security vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious actors.

Analysis of FireSSH

Overall verdict

  • FireSSH is no longer actively maintained. Additionally, with the evolution of browser technologies and security concerns, browser-based SSH clients like FireSSH have seen a decline in favorability compared to standalone applications. Users are generally encouraged to use dedicated SSH clients for enhanced security and more reliable performance.

Why this product is good

  • FireSSH was once a popular SSH client extension for the Firefox browser because it integrated seamlessly into the browser and provided a convenient way for users to access SSH terminals without needing a separate application. It was appreciated for its ease of use and platform independence, working on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Recommended for

    FireSSH is not recommended for modern use. However, if you need a lightweight, browser-based SSH solution and are using an older version of Firefox, it might still work for basic needs. For current needs, consider using dedicated SSH clients like PuTTY, OpenSSH, or more modern web-based solutions like 'ShellHub' for secure, efficient, and supported SSH access.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FireSSH and Persistent SSH)

FireSSH

Persistent SSH

SSH
54 54%
SSH
46% 46
Server Management
54 54%
Server Management
46% 46
Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0
Network & Admin
50 50%
Network & Admin
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using FireSSH and Persistent SSH. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FireSSH and Persistent SSH

FireSSH Reviews

10 best SSH Clients for Windows: free alternatives to PuTTY
If for whatever reason you prefer not to use a separate software for SSH remote administration, then FireSSH addon for Firefox and Chrome can be a great alternative. A great example is when you are on a system that you do not have administrative privileges. While portable SSH clients could work on such Windows PCs, FireSSH extension is platform independent.
Source: www.smarthomebeginner.com

Persistent SSH Reviews

We have no reviews of Persistent SSH yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Persistent SSH seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FireSSH mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of FireSSH yet. Tracking of FireSSH recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Persistent SSH mentions (1)

  • ssh tunneling
    KiTTy (A PuTTy derivative) has support for SSH-tunnels build-in. If you like the results then you can use something like persistant SSH tunnels (or a FOSS alternative) to maintain them. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FireSSH and Persistent SSH, you can also consider the following products

KiTTY - KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.

Console - Console is a Windows console window enhancement.

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

PowerShell - Download WMF. Windows Management Framework contains the latest versions of PowerShell, DSC, WMI, and WinRM for older versions of Windows. PowerShell Module Browser. Search for PowerShell modules and cmdlets.

Cygwin - Cygwin is a set of tools that provide Linux and POSIX functionality to Windows.

GNOME Terminal - GNOME Terminal is a terminal emulator for GNOME desktop.

Loading...