Firebase Cloud Messaging VS Apache Camel

Firebase Cloud Messaging Reviews

Apache Camel Reviews

Firebase Cloud Messaging mentions (38)

• How to Build Progressive Web Apps in 2024? A Step-byStep Guide

  Push Notifications allow PWAs to send real-time updates and messages to users, similar to native apps. React itself doesn't handle push notifications directly, but you can integrate third-party libraries like Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) to enable this functionality. - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago

• How to Send Firebase Push Notifications to Android

  Each mobile operating system provides its own solution for native application push notifications, so they can be tricky to integrate into your app. In Android, the mechanism native applications use for push notifications is Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) notifications. PubNub has taken FCM one step further and integrated the use of Firebase Cloud Messaging notifications into the PubNub Real-time Communications... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Custom vs. off-the-shelf React web notification systems: Which is better?

  Firebase Cloud Messaging, or FCM, is a service by Google that allows you to send notifications to Android and iOS devices. It is widely used and known for its reliability and scalability. It's also free up to a specific limit, making it an attractive option for startups and small businesses. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

• Looking to build a web tool inside a wordpress website from which push notifications can be sent

  I don’t see why not. I don’t have much experience with firebase myself I’ve always just contacted APNS etc directly via NodeJS. Maybe these docs will help you. Source: 11 months ago

• I created Loggl to keep track of my events.

  And Firebase is being used for push notifications using FCM (Firebase Cloud Messaging). Source: 12 months ago

Apache Camel mentions (12)

• Ask HN: What is the correct way to deal with pipelines?

  "correct" is a value judgement that depends on lots of different things. Only you can decide which tool is correct. Here are some ideas: - https://camel.apache.org/ - https://www.windmill.dev/ Your idea about a queue (in redis, or postgres, or sqlite, etc) is also totally valid. These off-the-shelf tools I listed probably wouldn't give you a huge advantage IMO. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Why messaging is much better than REST for inter-microservice communications

  This reminds me more of Apache Camel[0] than other things it's being compared to. > The process initiator puts a message on a queue, and another processor picks that up (probably on a different service, on a different host, and in different code base) - does some processing, and puts its (intermediate) result on another queue This is almost exactly the definition of message routing (ie: Camel). I'm a bit doubtful... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Can I continuously write to a CSV file with a python script while a Java application is continuously reading from it?

  Since you're writing a Java app to consume this, I highly recommend Apache Camel to do the consuming of messages for it. You can trivially aim it at file systems, message queues, databases, web services and all manner of other sources to grab your data for you, and you can change your mind about what that source is, without having to rewrite most of your client code. Source: over 1 year ago

• S3 to S3 transform

  For a simple sequential Pipeline, my goto would be Apache Camel. As soon as you want complexity its either Apache Nifi or a micro service architecture. Source: over 1 year ago

• 🗞️ We have just released our JBang! catalog 🛍️

  🐪 Apache Camel : Camel JBang, A JBang-based Camel app for easily running Camel routes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago