Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FileVista VS HTTP Commander

Compare FileVista VS HTTP Commander and see what are their differences

FileVista logo FileVista

Web-Based File Manager

HTTP Commander logo HTTP Commander

Web file access system for your Active Directory users and Windows file system. Must have for educational and other organisations with Windows users.
  • FileVista Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-15
  • HTTP Commander Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14

FileVista features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    FileVista offers an intuitive web interface that's easy to navigate, allowing users to manage files without significant technical expertise.
  • Web-Based Access
    The platform is web-based, enabling users to access their files from any device with an internet connection, promoting flexibility and remote work capabilities.
  • Security Features
    FileVista includes robust security measures, such as password protection, role-based permissions, and file encryption, to keep data safe and secure.
  • Scalability
    Designed to cater to businesses of all sizes, FileVista can scale with the growing data management needs of an organization.
  • Multi-User Support
    Allows multiple users to access and collaborate on files simultaneously, boosting productivity in team environments.

Possible disadvantages of FileVista

  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Some users may find the initial setup process complex, requiring IT support to properly configure the system to meet specific needs.
  • Cost
    To access the full breadth of features FileVista offers, users may need to pay a substantial licensing fee, which can be costly for smaller organizations.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    As a predominantly web-based solution, FileVista offers limited functionality when accessed offline, which might be a limitation for users needing consistent access.
  • Customization Constraints
    While FileVista offers a range of features, businesses requiring highly customized workflows or unique feature sets may find the platform limiting.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    Since FileVista is web-based, a reliable internet connection is necessary for optimal use, which can be a disadvantage in areas with unstable connectivity.

HTTP Commander features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    HTTP Commander provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface that resembles standard file explorers, which makes it easy for users to navigate and manage files online without any steep learning curve.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The tool is web-based, allowing users to access and manage files from various operating systems, such as Windows, macOS, and Linux, using any modern web browser.
  • Security Features
    Comes with robust security features including user authentication, permissions management, and SSL support, ensuring files are accessed and shared securely.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Offers integration options with existing systems and applications, such as ASP.NET, making it versatile for businesses to incorporate into their environment.
  • Rich File Management Features
    Supports a wide range of file management operations like upload, download, delete, rename, and edit, as well as advanced options like zip/unzip and text editor functionalities.

Possible disadvantages of HTTP Commander

  • Limited Offline Access
    As a web-based application, HTTP Commander requires an internet connection, which might be a limitation for users needing offline access or those in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for users without technical expertise or experience with ASP.NET applications.
  • Dependency on Web Browsers
    Since it relies on web browsers, performance can be affected by browser-specific issues and inconsistencies.
  • Licensing Costs
    The software may involve licensing costs, which could be a consideration for small businesses or personal users looking for free alternatives.
  • Scalability Concerns
    While suitable for small to medium-sized environments, there might be limitations or performance issues when scaling up to handle very large datasets or numerous concurrent users.

FileVista videos

Installing FileVista (Version 6.x)

More videos:

  • Review - Microsoft Forefront UAG 2010 - Integrating FileVista from GleamTech with the UAG

HTTP Commander videos

Web file manager HTTP Commander Active Directory integration: 10 minutes to install and configure

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FileVista and HTTP Commander)
Cloud Storage
51 51%
49% 49
File Sharing
51 51%
49% 49
File Management
52 52%
48% 48
Office Suites
57 57%
43% 43

User comments

Share your experience with using FileVista and HTTP Commander. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FileVista and HTTP Commander, you can also consider the following products

FileRun - Beautiful, fast and reliable selfhosted file sharing and sync.

PHPfileNavigator - PHPfileNavigator: Administrador de ficheros y directorios via web.

HRCloud2 - A full-featured home-hosted Cloud Drive & Personal Assistant.

FilesAnywhere - FilesAnywhere offers free 1GB online file storage, with cloud storage solutions for Internet...

BytesFall Explorer - BytesFall Explorer (bfExplorer for short) is a web-based file manager written in PHP and JavaScript...

PHP File Manager - phpFileManager is a complete filesystem management tool on a single file.