FigTree VS Benchling

Most published papers with phylogenies as a major result should include the tree in some form as part of the supplementary material. For just visualizing trees, I'd recommend something like FigTree, which is pretty straightforward and has a nice interface (though limited ability to actually do much with them). It should be able to read files with .tre, .nexus, or .newick extensions (the latter of which is just the... Source: 5 months ago

Again, this is an overall about phylogeny, not knowing how your data looks like I would sugges futher reading, the programs commonly used are: PAUP, MEGA, PHYLIP, TREE-PUZZLE and MrBayes. Options are: FigTree, PRABI and BEAST. Source: over 1 year ago

Yes, because TRACER has nothing to do with the tree log file, and (almost) never records anything to do with the tree. First, locate the summary tree output file. This is produced by one of the following functions: consensusTree() mapTree(), mccTree(). Then make sure you have tree viewing software installed like figtree. Then open the summary tree file in your tree viewing software, and find the appropriate menu... Source: almost 3 years ago

You can make use of genetic data from there by designing your own genetic sequences. Check out benchling.com if you're interested in that. You could make projects that are about designing different proteins, that you can then also visualise in a website, or using pymol. Source: 12 months ago

Sucrase has been extensively tested. It can successfully build The Benchling frontend code Babel React, TSLint, Apollo client, and Decaffeinate With all…. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Benchling : Powerful tool to manage,design, analyze, and share sequence data || suggested by /u/grumpy_goat and r/labrats. Source: almost 3 years ago