Software Alternatives & Reviews

ferm VS ufw

Compare ferm VS ufw and see what are their differences

ferm logo ferm

ferm is a tool to maintain complex firewalls, without having the trouble to rewrite the complex...

ufw logo ufw

Ufw stands for Uncomplicated Firewall, and is program for managing a netfilter firewall.
  • ferm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-06-05
  • ufw Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

ferm videos

FERM Scroll Saw Unboxing & Scroll Saw Review

More videos:

  • Review - ACTION FERM outils bricolage 20V à petit prix (Découverte gamme) (marteau perforateur meuleuse...
  • Review - Ferm Cordless Drill 20V 1.5Ah

ufw videos

Linux Security - UFW Complete Guide (Uncomplicated Firewall)

More videos:

  • Tutorial - UFW Firewall (Uncomplicated Firewall) - Complete Tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ferm and ufw)
Firewall
33 33%
67% 67
Monitoring Tools
32 32%
68% 68
Security & Privacy
47 47%
53% 53
Cyber Security
32 32%
68% 68

User comments

Share your experience with using ferm and ufw. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ferm and ufw

ferm Reviews

We have no reviews of ferm yet.
Be the first one to post

ufw Reviews

8 Best Open Source Firewall to Protect Your Network
ufw (uncomplicated firewall) works with Ubuntu. It provides a command-line interface to manage the Linux kernel packet filtering system (netfilter).
Source: geekflare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

ufw might be a bit more popular than ferm. We know about 4 links to it since March 2021 and only 4 links to ferm. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ferm mentions (4)

  • DHCP is not blocked by ufw/iptables
    I remember hating shorewall and similar ones because, well, I know iptables, and I know exactly what I want so using anything that tries to abstract it into it's own approach is torture as I need to take the rules I want and translate it to whatever mediocre paradigm shorewall (or ufw, or near-any other firewall manager in the wild) decided to put on top of iptables. I ended up using ferm... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • what is your favourite firewall frontend?
    I'm a big fan of ferm. Many major distros have it readily available as a package, and it makes for beautifully readable firewall definitions. Source: about 1 year ago
  • anyone use a front-end to iptables?
    The last time I needed to do complex iptables stuff, I found FERM really helpful. The structured config language greatly reduces the amount of boilerplate code you have to type, while still having a pretty direct mapping to the emitted iptables rules. A bit like compiling sass to css. Source: about 2 years ago
  • dog: An open source firewall management system for packs of firewalls (iptables)
    Also just about last thing I want is to deploy another configuration management system alongside the system that manages everything else on machine. Currently we just use Puppet to deploy ferm rules (which is best described as "iptables+", naming convention and such are still iptables-like but a lot of macros/syntax sugar around it). Source: almost 3 years ago

ufw mentions (4)

  • Cannot install gufw in fedora37
    You may already know this, but gufw is simply a graphical front-end to the Uncomplicated Firewall (ufw) service. Fedora uses the Firewalld back-end service instead of ufw. I believe you would need to replace Firewalld with ufw entirely in order to make gufw a plausible solution. Source: about 1 year ago
  • ufw --help is very bad
    I just started using ufw https://launchpad.net/ufw and I found that it only shows --help for the root command. Source: over 2 years ago
  • why UFW is open-source and GUFW is proprietary ?
    Why do you think Gufw is proprietary? It's FOSS, licensed as GPL v3, as documented here. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Huge surge in hits to connectivitycheck.gstatic.com from my phone knocks out my PiHole
    Another option is to use UFW and rate limit incoming packets. Because it's a firewall, it will block the queries even before they hit Pi-hole, but it might be a tad more tricky to set up. I also don't know if you can set it as a limitation per client or only in general (per port/rule). I'll leave that for you to investigate further. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ferm and ufw, you can also consider the following products

Advanced Policy Firewall - Server-based firewall.

TinyWall - Lightweight and non-intrusive firewall

Shorewall - The Shoreline Firewall, more commonly known as “Shorewall”, is high-level tool for configuring...

Windows 10 Firewall Control - Windows 10 Firewall Control: simple and exhaustive solution for applications network activity controlling and monitoring.

pfSense - pfSense is a free and open source firewall and router that also features unified threat management, load balancing, multi WAN, and more

Emsisoft Online Armor Firewall - Emsisoft Online Armor Firewall is a freemium online firewall protection system by the Emsisoft that is based on the own independent protection technology of the Emsisoft.