fediverse.party VS Gab

As commented here, please be be available in Fediverse. Your presence will nicely align with your approach to Open Source. Source: 11 months ago

You just described the Fediverse, and it already exists. Come join the fun https://fediverse.party/. Source: 11 months ago

Lemmy is part of the Fediverse. The Fediverse is "decentralized, autonomous networks running on free open software on a myriad of servers across the world." Since Lemmy is hosted on multiple servers and runs on multiple instances, it is impossible for the entirety of it to go down. Separate instances (or servers) could go down, but users would be able to login using a different instance and continue to access the... Source: 11 months ago

Also, while KasmVNC and the KASM and LinuxServer docker images are open source, Kasm Workspaces itself is not Open Source, but they do have a #Selfhosted Community Edition available for free, and they do use some portions of Apache Guacamole in their product. - Apache Guacamole is completely Open Source and free, backed by the Apache Foundation. (Cross-posting from Kbin on the fediverse). Source: 11 months ago

This protocol sits at the basis of many other such platforms/software/whatever you want to call them as well, and allows you to post from one to another using your same account, wherever that might be. Source: 11 months ago

If you want uncensored.. https://gab.ai. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

I don't understand how you can stop spam yet not have the structures in place to censor forbidden views or opinions. Without admin moderation you get 50 million flavours of porn (like old Usenet servers) some of which will be illegal porn, a massive slice of QAnon and conspiracy (like Odyssee and gab.ai), information and propaganda useful to terrorists (like the old totse.com) and dark web drug markets. Source: about 2 years ago

This already exists in the "Dissenter browser" made by the folks over at gab.ai. This could work as a third party extension, but direct support from Brave would instantly draw controversy as it's perceived that the only reason Dissenter exists is to support toxic radical right wingers. Source: over 2 years ago

I feel that there is still space for a platform for content creators which is away from any restrictions. I was talking to a lawyer friend of mine about drafting a user agreement which makes it impossible for anyone to sue any content creator or the platform, or for any government or group to force removal of content. but in the end we figured that we would need a back to back agreement with our service... Source: almost 3 years ago