Software Alternatives & Reviews

Fail2ban VS Caddy

Compare Fail2ban VS Caddy and see what are their differences

Fail2ban logo Fail2ban

Intrusion prevention framework

Caddy logo Caddy

The HTTP/2 Web Server with Automatic HTTPS
  • Fail2ban Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-02
  • Caddy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-22

Fail2ban videos

Ubuntu Server 18.04 Administration Guide Part 10 - Securing Applications with Fail2ban

More videos:

  • Review - Securing your Cloud Server with Fail2ban
  • Review - fail2ban on FreePBX

Caddy videos

Getting started with Caddy the HTTPS Web Server from scratch

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fail2ban and Caddy)
Cyber Security
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers

User comments

Share your experience with using Fail2ban and Caddy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Fail2ban and Caddy

Fail2ban Reviews

We have no reviews of Fail2ban yet.
Be the first one to post

Caddy Reviews

Top Linux Web Servers: Pros and Cons
Now that we know their advantages and disadvantages, which web server is the best? The answer depends on your use case. Nginx is a very fast and powerful option, Apache is a great general-purpose web server, while LiteSpeed represents a premium alternative. Caddy works great if you need simplicity, while Lighthttpd works best when resources are low.
Source: bigstep.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Caddy seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 226 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fail2ban mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fail2ban yet. Tracking of Fail2ban recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Caddy mentions (226)

  • How I use Devbox in my Elm projects
    These projects use Caddy as my local development server, Dart Sass for converting my Sass files to CSS, elm, elm-format, elm-optimize-level-2, elm-review, elm-test (only in Calculator), ShellCheck to find bugs in my shell scripts, and Terser to mangle and compress JavaScript code. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • Yet Another Tour of an Open-Source Elm SPA
    It uses devbox, Elm 0.19.1, the latest Elm packages (in particular elm/http 2.0.0), elm-review, Caddy, a sprinkle of Dart Sass, and a handful of Bash scripts (one of them being a deployment script). It uses elm test and features tests for key data structures. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • How to securely reverse-proxy ASP.NET Core web apps
    However, it's very unlikely that .NET developers will directly expose their Kestrel-based web apps to the internet. Typically, we use other popular web servers like Nginx, Traefik, and Caddy to act as a reverse-proxy in front of Kestrel for various reasons:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Show HN: Nano-web, a low latency one binary webserver designed for serving SPAs
    Caddy [1] is a single binary. It is not minimal, but the size difference is barely noticeable. serve also comes to mind. If you have node installed, `npx serve .` does exactly that. There are a few go projects that fit your description, none of them very popular, probably because they end up being a 20-line wrapper around http frameworks just like this one. [1] https://caddyserver.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • I Deployed My Own Cute Lil’ Private Internet (a.k.a. VPC)
    Each app’s front end is built with Qwik and uses Tailwind for styling. The server-side is powered by Qwik City (Qwik’s official meta-framework) and runs on Node.js hosted on a shared Linode VPS. The apps also use PM2 for process management and Caddy as a reverse proxy and SSL provisioner. The data is stored in a PostgreSQL database that also runs on a shared Linode VPS. The apps interact with the database using... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fail2ban and Caddy, you can also consider the following products

RdpGuard - RdpGuard allows you to protect your Remote Desktop (RDP), POP3, FTP, SMTP, IMAP, MSSQL, MySQL, VoIP/SIP from brute-force attacks by blocking attacker's IP address. Fail2Ban for Windows.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

SSHGuard - SSHGuard monitors services through their logging activity.

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

IPBan - Block hacking attempts on RDP, SSH, SMTP and much more

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments