Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Extend by Auth0 VS Checkmarx

Compare Extend by Auth0 VS Checkmarx and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Extend by Auth0 logo Extend by Auth0

Let your customers write the rules

Checkmarx logo Checkmarx

The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.
  • Extend by Auth0 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-25
  • Checkmarx Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-29

Extend by Auth0 features and specs

  • Ease of Integration
    Extend by Auth0 offers a seamless integration process that allows developers to easily implement authentication and authorization without extensive knowledge of security protocols.
  • Customizable Authentication
    It provides customizable authentication flows, giving developers the ability to tailor the user experience to match their application's specific needs and requirements.
  • Scalability
    The platform supports scalability, enabling it to handle a growing number of users and an increasing volume of authentication requests without compromising performance.
  • Security Features
    Offers advanced security features, such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) and anomaly detection, which help safeguard user data and protect against unauthorized access.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    Extend by Auth0 provides thorough documentation and resources, making it easier for developers to understand and implement its features effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Extend by Auth0

  • Cost
    Depending on the scale and features used, Extend by Auth0 can become costly for startups or small businesses working with a limited budget.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The platform can be complex for beginners who do not have prior experience with authentication and authorization, potentially leading to implementation challenges.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying heavily on this service may lead to vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch to another provider without significant redevelopment efforts.
  • Customization Limitations
    While customizable, there may be limitations on the extent of customization possible, which might not fully align with the needs of highly specialized applications.
  • Performance Variability
    Some users have reported variability in performance, particularly during peak usage times, which can affect the user experience.

Checkmarx features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coverage
    Checkmarx provides extensive support for multiple programming languages and frameworks, allowing for a broad range of applications to be scanned.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform integrates well with various DevOps tools and CI/CD pipelines, making it easier to incorporate security checks into the software development lifecycle.
  • Customization
    Offers highly customizable rule sets that can be tailored to specific security requirements and coding standards of the organization.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface that allows users to efficiently manage and analyze security vulnerabilities.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale efficiently, Checkmarx can handle large codebases and multiple projects concurrently without significant performance degradation.
  • Strong Reporting Capabilities
    Provides detailed and actionable reports that help developers and security teams quickly understand and address vulnerabilities.
  • Automation
    Supports automated scanning, which helps reduce manual efforts and accelerates the vulnerability detection process.

Possible disadvantages of Checkmarx

  • Cost
    Checkmarx can be expensive, especially for small to medium-sized organizations with limited budgets for security tools.
  • False Positives
    Although comprehensive, the platform sometimes generates false positives, which can lead to unnecessary work and distractions for development teams.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may face a steep learning curve due to the wide range of features and customization options available.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, scanning large and complex codebases can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, potentially impacting development timelines.
  • Customer Support
    Some users have reported that customer support can be slow to respond and may not always provide satisfactory solutions to issues.
  • Initial Setup
    The initial setup process can be complex and time-consuming, requiring considerable effort to properly configure all settings and integrations.

Extend by Auth0 videos

No Extend by Auth0 videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Checkmarx videos

+ Add

Viewing results and understanding security issues via Checkmarx online scanner

More videos:

  • Demo - Checkmarx CxSAST Demonstration
  • Review - Meetups at Checkmarx: An Introduction to API Security
  • Review - Source code review with Checkmarx
  • Review - Checkmarx Results Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Extend by Auth0 and Checkmarx)

Extend by Auth0

Checkmarx

SaaS
100 100%
SaaS
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
Code Analysis
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
Web Service Automation
0% 0
Web Application Security
0 0%
Web Application Security
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Extend by Auth0 and Checkmarx. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Extend by Auth0 and Checkmarx

Extend by Auth0 Reviews

We have no reviews of Extend by Auth0 yet.
Be the first one to post

Checkmarx Reviews

The Top 11 Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools
Why We Picked Checkmarx SAST: We like Checkmarx SAST for its early detection of vulnerabilities, which enables faster and safer code development. Its AI-assisted prioritization of vulnerabilities according to severity and risk helps reduce false positives.
Source: expertinsights.com
Top 11 SonarQube Alternatives in 2024
Checkmarx is a developer-centric security tool that specializes in secure coding practices and compliance. It helps developers identify and fix security vulnerabilities in their code, ensuring that their applications are secure and compliant with regulatory standards. Checkmarx offers a range of tools and features to help developers build secure applications, including...
Source: www.codeant.ai
The 5 Best SonarQube Alternatives in 2024
While SonarQube offers some security features, Checkmarx provides a more holistic approach to application security, covering a more comprehensive range of security aspects throughout the SDLC. Checkmarx One's consolidation of multiple AppSec tools into a single platform could simplify management and reduce the total cost of ownership compared to using SonarQube alongside...
Source: blog.codacy.com
Ten Best SonarQube alternatives in 2021
CheckMarx has been used to test the programs to rectify vulnerability in the code and try the security lapses. Checkmarx is the software program exposure Platform for the enterprise. It has an impressive Codebashing characteristic that has the threshold over SonarQube. The software tracking-reporting function is good too. The "delta-experiment" function is it's far genuinely...
Source: duecode.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Checkmarx seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Extend by Auth0 mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Extend by Auth0 yet. Tracking of Extend by Auth0 recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Checkmarx mentions (3)

  • Penetration Testing for API Security: Protecting Digital Gateways
    Tools like SonarQube, Checkmarx, or Snyk can automate parts of this process by scanning for known vulnerability patterns. While white box testing may not reflect real-world attack scenarios (as attackers rarely access source code), it provides the most thorough assessment of security posture. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • A Guide to DevSecOps with API Gateway
    Automate security testing: Use tools such as OWASP ZAP, SonarQube, or Checkmarx to automate security testing. This will help you identify security issues early in the development process and reduce the risk of vulnerabilities being introduced into your code. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • 11 Top DevSecOps Tools
    Application Security (AppSec) is the forte of Checkmarx, which is an award-winning AppSec Testing tool that integrates security policies into the DevOps workflow and ensures security across the application lifecycle. Checkmarx scans all your code and provides actionable insights for critical vulnerabilities. Checkmarx also offers developer-friendly AppSec training that makes the transition to DevSecOps more... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Extend by Auth0 and Checkmarx, you can also consider the following products

Integrations.js - Launch new features at the click of a button.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

SaaS 1000 - Free exportable list of the fastest growing SaaS companies

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

hotglue - An embeddable data integration tool for B2B developers built on the Python ecosystem.

Veracode - Veracode's application security software products are simpler and more scalable to increase the resiliency of your application infrastructure.

Loading...