Evil VS PyScripter

Compare Evil VS PyScripter and see what are their differences

Flowlu

All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

PyScripter

PyScripter is a free and open-source Python Integrated Development Environment (IDE) created with...

Landing page //
2023-08-04

Landing page //
2023-09-18

Evil features and specs

Vim Emulation
Evil provides a near-complete emulation of Vim’s features within Emacs, allowing users who are familiar with Vim to transition without losing their preferred keybindings and workflow.
Customizability
Evil allows users to customize their configurations extensively, combining the powerful text-editing capabilities of Vim with the customizability of Emacs.
Community Support
Evil has a large and active community, providing a wealth of plugins and resources to enhance the text editing experience.
Mode Integration
Evil integrates smoothly with various Emacs major and minor modes, allowing users to leverage the full functionality of Emacs alongside Vim's modal editing.

Possible disadvantages of Evil

Learning Curve
For users unfamiliar with Vim, the modal editing approach can introduce a significant learning curve, particularly for those accustomed to traditional text editors.
Complex Configuration
Configuring Evil to fully integrate with existing Emacs setups can be complex and time-consuming, especially when customizing keybindings and behaviors.
Performance
In some cases, using Evil with certain Emacs configurations or plugins may lead to performance issues, such as lag or delayed responses.
Inconsistencies
There might be inconsistencies between Evil’s implementation of Vim features and the original, which could affect workflows for power users who rely on specific Vim functionalities.

PyScripter features and specs

Lightweight
PyScripter is designed to be a lightweight IDE, which means that it loads quickly and doesn't consume much system resources compared to more comprehensive IDEs like PyCharm.
Free and Open Source
PyScripter is available for free and its source code is open for anyone to view, modify, and distribute, making it a cost-effective option for developers.
Windows Integration
As a Windows-only IDE, PyScripter integrates well with the Windows operating system, offering features like Windows shell support and native look and feel.
Debugger
PyScripter provides a robust integrated debugger with features like breakpoints, call stack visibility, and step-through execution, which are crucial for effective debugging.
Python Versions Support
It supports multiple versions of Python, allowing developers to easily switch between different Python environments or scripts that require different Python versions.

Possible disadvantages of PyScripter

Windows-Only
PyScripter is only available for Windows, which limits its accessibility for developers using macOS or Linux platforms.
Limited Features
Compared to some other IDEs like PyCharm or Visual Studio Code, PyScripter may lack some advanced features and plugins that are available in those environments.
Less Community Support
The community around PyScripter is smaller compared to more popular IDEs, which can make it harder to find help or resources specific to PyScripter.
UI/UX Design
The user interface, while functional, may not be as modern or visually appealing as other popular IDEs, which could impact user experience.

Evil videos

+ Add

Evil - Season 1 Review [No Spoilers]

PyScripter videos

+ Add

Introduction to PyScripter, the Portable Python IDE

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Evil and PyScripter)

PyScripter

Text Editors

51 51%

Text Editors

49% 49

IDE

43 43%

IDE

57% 57

Software Development

100 100%

Software Development

0% 0

Python IDE

0 0%

Python IDE

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Evil and PyScripter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Evil seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 60 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Evil mentions (60)

Creating an Emacs major mode - because why not?
For multiple reasons, one of them just being curiosity, I started using Emacs. And before anyone wants to start waging the holy war of editors1, I'll put myself out there and pronounce that the one and only correct answer is: Emacs with EVIL (GitHub) mode. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Helix-gpui: helix gpui front end
Emacs is whatever you want it to be, and it has wonderful modal editing packages such as evil-mode[1] - which surpasses the editing system from vi that it is based on - and Meow[2] 1. https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Packages that you would like to be in emacs core ?
Since we already have vyper-mode, why not add Evil to the stack? Source: over 1 year ago
Ask HN: Does anyone Lisp without Emacs?
2 stripe blue belt here! I used to use Vim for everything other than Java development and have now adopted Emacs in the same way. I am using it for Clojure and Common Lisp development along with org mode, irc, rss, git and file management I started with Evil mode and then moved to Xah fly keys before sticking to the emacs bindings. Having the caps lock key bound to CTRL helped me a lot. I don't know if it makes... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Emacs Is My New Window Manager
If you already know Vim, you should probably not use Emacs without Evil: https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil It gives you comprehensive Vim bindings so what you need to learn to be comfortable in Emacs is very little. As a bonus, it also keeps your RSI risk unchanged. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago