Software Alternatives & Reviews

Errorception VS PeakFlow

Compare Errorception VS PeakFlow and see what are their differences

Errorception logo Errorception

Painless JavaScript Error Tracking

PeakFlow logo PeakFlow

Continuous integration build testing and error reporting for developers.
  • Errorception Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-15
  • PeakFlow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-27

Errorception videos

errorception.com: Painless client-side JavaScript Error Tracking -Rakesh Pai

More videos:

  • Review - Architecture of Errorception by Rakesh Pai

PeakFlow videos

No PeakFlow videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Errorception and PeakFlow)
Error Tracking
82 82%
18% 18
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Exception Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Errorception and PeakFlow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Errorception and PeakFlow, you can also consider the following products

TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging - JavaScript Error Monitoring from TrackJS gives you context about what's happening in your end-users' browsers.

Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.

Rollbar - Rollbar collects errors that happen in your application, notifies you, and analyzes them so you can debug and fix them. Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, JavaScript, and Flash libraries available.

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

CatchJS - Unbloated, yet feature rich. CatchJS provides JavaScript Error Tracking the way it should be.

Buildbot - Python-based continuous integration testing framework