Emscripten VS zapcc

Https://infinitemac.org, which is https://basilisk.cebix.net compiled for the web using https://emscripten.org. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

One place that I’ve found some real, open source unit tests to look at for an example is in the emsdk for emscripten: https://emscripten.org. Source: 5 months ago

I am playing around with Emscipten which wraps around clang to compile C/C++ code in WASM binary and provide some glue-code API to embed WASM binary into JavaScript. Look into MDN Docs and Emscripten SDK to get started. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

Elm is a different approach that compiles into JavaScript. In the extreme case, you have Emscripten which will compile many language into JavaScript but will feel really clumsy compared to using JavaScript in a lot of cases. Source: 11 months ago

SQLite is a pretty popular database and it's a critical dependency for many different applications. By compiling it to Wasm32-wasi, you can add it to any WebAssembly module. This enables a new set of possibilities for Wasm and SQLite. For example, now you can run a full WordPress application in the browser [1][2] / server [3] using the same Wasm module. Note that for the browser these projects use Emscripten [4],... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

How does it compare to zapcc? My team used it a few years ago. https://github.com/yrnkrn/zapcc. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

C++ modules helps with the parsing problem similar to precompiled headers, but it doesn't help with the code execution at compile time problem. All your overload matching, free function lookup, SFINAE, concept matching, and consteval code needs executing and that can take very considerable time. Other than JITing all that stuff, and maybe running an in-memory server like https://github.com/yrnkrn/zapcc, I don't... Source: over 2 years ago