Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

EditorConfig VS Git-cliff

Compare EditorConfig VS Git-cliff and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

EditorConfig logo EditorConfig

EditorConfig is a file format and collection of text editor plugins for maintaining consistent coding styles between different editors and IDEs.

Git-cliff logo Git-cliff

A highly customizable Changelog Generator that follows Conventional Commit specifications.
  • EditorConfig Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-25
  • Git-cliff Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29

EditorConfig features and specs

  • Consistency Across Editors
    EditorConfig helps maintain consistent coding styles for multiple developers working on the same project across various editors and IDEs. This ensures that all developers adhere to the same coding standards, minimizing discrepancies in code formatting.
  • Ease of Use
    EditorConfig files are simple to set up and use. Once the configuration file is in place, any supported editor with the EditorConfig plugin installed will automatically enforce the styles, requiring minimal ongoing maintenance from developers.
  • Compatibility
    EditorConfig is compatible with a wide range of editors and IDEs through plugins, allowing developers to use their preferred development environment while still adhering to project-wide formatting rules.
  • Source Control Friendliness
    By enforcing consistent styles, EditorConfig reduces the likelihood of unnecessary code diffs caused by differing formatting preferences, making version control diffs cleaner and easier to understand.

Possible disadvantages of EditorConfig

  • Limited Scope
    EditorConfig focuses primarily on basic whitespace and file-ending settings. It does not provide comprehensive style enforcement, such as linting for programming language-specific syntax rules or convention enforcement beyond formatting.
  • Requires Editor Support
    EditorConfig requires either native support or plugins to be installed in the editor or IDE. If a developer is using an unsupported editor or does not have the plugin installed, they may not benefit from the configuration.
  • Potential for Inconsistencies
    Depending on the implementation of the EditorConfig plugin in specific editors, there can be slight differences in how rules are applied. This can potentially lead to inconsistencies if not all team members use the same tools or versions.
  • Basic Feature Set
    EditorConfig’s feature set is relatively basic compared to other tools that offer more robust configurations and checks, such as full-featured code linters and formatters that enforce a wider array of coding conventions and rules.

Git-cliff features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

EditorConfig videos

EditorConfig, A tool I include in all my projects

More videos:

  • Review - Detecting missing ConfigureAwait with FxCop and EditorConfig - Dotnetos 5-minute Code Reviews
  • Review - 15 Visual Studio Editor Tips including Intellicode and EditorConfig

Git-cliff videos

No Git-cliff videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to EditorConfig and Git-cliff)
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100
Code Analysis
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using EditorConfig and Git-cliff. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, EditorConfig seems to be a lot more popular than Git-cliff. While we know about 84 links to EditorConfig, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Git-cliff. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

EditorConfig mentions (84)

  • Converting a Git repo from tabs to spaces (2016)
    FWIW: EditorConfig isn't a ".net ecosystem" thing but works across a ton of languages, editors and IDEs: https://editorconfig.org/ Also, rather than using GitHub Actions to validate if it was followed (after branch was pushed/PR was opened), add it as a Git hook (https://git-scm.com/docs/githooks) to run right before commit, so every commit will be valid and the iteration<>feedback loop gets like 400% faster as... - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago
  • Config-file-validator v1.7.0 released!
    Added support for EditorConfig, .env, and HOCON validation. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • C-style: My favorite C programming practices
    There is always .editorconfig [1] to setup indent if you have a directory of files. In places where it really matters (Python) I'll always comment with what I've used. [1] https://editorconfig.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • How to set up a new project using Yarn
    .editorconfig helps maintain consistent coding styles for multiple developers working on the same project across various editors and IDEs. Find more information on the EditorConfig website if you’re curious. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Most basic code formatting
    These are tools that you need to add. But the most elemental code formatting is not here, it is in the widely supported .editorconfig file. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Git-cliff mentions (3)

  • Getting Started with CLI tools in Rust using Clap
    Git-cliff is a terminal tool that can generate changelog from the Git history by using conventional commits, as well as by using regex-powered parsers and you can even change the changelog template itself by using a configuration file. This tool is a great example of text parsing on the terminal and also uses clap_mangen which generates man pages. Useful for anyone who is serious about looking into making a... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Auto-Generated Customer-Friendly Changelogs
    Solutions exist for this. Our company does this with git-cliff. Using conventional commits, any commit labeled with the subject "www" will appear in our public changelog. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • changelog-gh-usernames: A tool to replace emails in changelogs with GitHub usernames
    This was primarily aimed to work with git-cliff to generate changelogs for GitHub releases, since tagging contributors would include them as contributors for the release, while also ensuring structured changelogs thanks to git-cliff. As of now, it requires a few extra steps to get it working with git-cliff, but the integration should be much better once the PR for post-processors is merged. Source: about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing EditorConfig and Git-cliff, you can also consider the following products

Prettier - An opinionated code formatter

Changefeed - A beautiful changelog for your product in seconds

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

Changelog.gy - Every product needs a changelog

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

pre-commit - A slightly improved pre-commit hook for git