Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Eclipse Memory Analyzer VS Apache JMeter

Compare Eclipse Memory Analyzer VS Apache JMeter and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Eclipse Memory Analyzer logo Eclipse Memory Analyzer

The Eclipse Foundation - home to a global community, the Eclipse IDE, Jakarta EE and over 350 open source projects, including runtimes, tools and frameworks.

Apache JMeter logo Apache JMeter

Apache JMeter™.
  • Eclipse Memory Analyzer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-15
  • Apache JMeter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

Eclipse Memory Analyzer features and specs

  • Efficient Memory Leak Detection
    Eclipse Memory Analyzer is highly effective at detecting memory leaks and helping developers understand why a Java application is consuming excessive memory.
  • Comprehensive Heap Analysis
    It provides detailed insights into memory consumption, object retention, and references within heap dumps, which can help in optimizing application performance.
  • Standalone and Integrative
    Eclipse MAT can be used as a standalone tool or integrated into Eclipse IDE, providing flexibility based on user preference.
  • Automated Reports
    The tool can automatically generate reports that highlight potential memory issues, making it easier for developers to diagnose problems without deep manual inspection.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, it is freely available and benefits from community support, which can be advantageous for customization and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Eclipse Memory Analyzer

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The tool can be complex for new users to learn, as it requires understanding of Java memory management and heap dump analysis.
  • Performance Overheads
    Analyzing large heap dumps can be resource-intensive and time-consuming, potentially requiring significant computational power and memory.
  • Java-Specific
    The tool is designed specifically for Java applications, limiting its usability for developers working in other programming environments or languages.
  • GUI Limitations
    Some users find the graphical user interface to be less intuitive compared to other modern development tools, which can impact productivity.
  • Sparse Official Documentation
    While community support exists, the official documentation can be sparse and insufficient for solving complex issues or fully utilizing advanced features.

Apache JMeter features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache JMeter is free to use, reducing the overall cost of testing and allowing for significant customization by the community.
  • Extensibility
    JMeter is highly extensible with plugins, which can add additional functionalities and capabilities tailored to specific needs.
  • Strong Community Support
    Due to its long history and widespread usage, JMeter benefits from a large, active community that provides tutorials, plugins, and troubleshooting help.
  • Supports Various Protocols
    JMeter supports a wide range of testing protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, LDAP, JDBC, and JMS, making it versatile for different types of applications.
  • Continuous Integration
    JMeter can be easily integrated with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, enabling automated performance testing in the development pipeline.
  • Graphical Interface
    The graphical user interface (GUI) makes it easier for testers to design and configure testing scenarios without extensive programming knowledge.

Possible disadvantages of Apache JMeter

  • Resource Intensive
    JMeter can be resource-intensive, especially when simulating high loads, which may require substantial hardware to mimic real-world scenarios.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Despite its GUI, JMeter can be complex to learn and use effectively, especially for those who are new to performance testing.
  • Limited Reporting
    JMeter's built-in reporting capabilities can be somewhat limited, requiring additional tools or plugins for more advanced reporting and analysis.
  • Not Ideal for UI Testing
    JMeter is not suitable for front-end or UI testing, as it is primarily designed for performance and load testing of backend services.
  • Memory Consumption
    The GUI mode, in particular, can consume a significant amount of memory, impacting performance during large-scale tests.

Eclipse Memory Analyzer videos

No Eclipse Memory Analyzer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Apache JMeter videos

Book Review - Master Apache JMeter - From load testing to DevOps

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Eclipse Memory Analyzer and Apache JMeter)
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Resource Profiling And Monitoring
Software Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Eclipse Memory Analyzer and Apache JMeter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Eclipse Memory Analyzer and Apache JMeter

Eclipse Memory Analyzer Reviews

We have no reviews of Eclipse Memory Analyzer yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache JMeter Reviews

Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2019 (Comprehensive List)
Apache JMeter is an open-source Java desktop application designed for load testing. It mainly focuses on web applications. This tool can also be employed for unit testing and limited functional testing.
Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2018 (Comprehensive List)
Apache JMeter is an open-source Java desktop application designed for load testing. It mainly focuses on web applications. This tool can also be employed for unit testing and limited functional testing.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache JMeter should be more popular than Eclipse Memory Analyzer. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Eclipse Memory Analyzer mentions (1)

  • Graph Data Fits in Memory
    Https://eclipse.dev/mat/ can handle very large graphs of objects using a similar approach. It also does implement some kind of paging, such that you do not have to load the complete graph into memory when running some of the graph algorithms. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Apache JMeter mentions (2)

  • Java naming facts
    Before Jakarta EE there was Apache Jakarta which was effectively the group name for Java based projects within the Apache project. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Are servers multithreaded by default?
    If you remove Spring from the equation you need to build the servlets yourself (according to the Sevlet API). You probably package the servlets in a war-file (with some configuration files), the war-file can then be deployed in a servlet server (ie Tomcat,). The sevlet servser usually handles the thread pool and other resources (ie database connection pools) for you, so you "only" have to provide a servlet that... Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Eclipse Memory Analyzer and Apache JMeter, you can also consider the following products

VisualVM - VisualVM is a visual tool integrating several commandline JDK tools and lightweight profiling...

locust - An open source load testing tool written in Python.

dotMemory - dotMemory allows users to analyze memory usage in a variety of .NET and .NET Core applications.

soapUI - SoapUI Pro is one of the most prominent API testing platforms around, allowing developers to quickly prototype the functions of their apps and get them to market with little hassle.

Robot Console - Robot Console is a Message and Event Monitoring Software for IBM i thathas automatic message management, resource monitoring, and log monitoring.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.