Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Earthly VS JetBrains TeamCity

Compare Earthly VS JetBrains TeamCity and see what are their differences

Earthly logo Earthly

Build anything via containers

JetBrains TeamCity logo JetBrains TeamCity

TeamCity is a continuous integration and build management system.
  • Earthly Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29
  • JetBrains TeamCity Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26

Earthly features and specs

  • Reproducible builds
    Earthly allows developers to create reproducible builds, ensuring that the build process is consistent across different environments.
  • Simplified CI/CD
    Earthly can integrate with existing CI/CD pipelines, providing a unified platform to define build and deployment processes, thereby reducing complexity and overhead.
  • Ease of Use
    Earthly uses a simple and intuitive syntax, which makes it easy for developers to get started quickly without a steep learning curve.
  • Cross-platform builds
    Earthly supports cross-platform builds, allowing developers to build applications for multiple environments from a single Earthfile.
  • Cache Optimization
    Earthly leverages caching mechanisms to optimize build times, saving both time and computing resources during the build process.

Possible disadvantages of Earthly

  • Learning Curve
    Although simpler than some alternatives, there is still a learning curve associated with understanding and utilizing Earthly effectively.
  • Community & Ecosystem
    Being relatively new, Earthly's community and ecosystem are not as expansive as more established tools, which can limit available resources and support.
  • Limited Integrations
    Earthly may have fewer direct integrations with other tools and services compared to well-established CI/CD ecosystems like Jenkins or GitHub Actions.
  • Runtime Performance
    For highly complex builds, the runtime performance might not match that of highly optimized, purpose-built CI/CD systems.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying heavily on Earthly for CI/CD processes might lead to a certain degree of vendor lock-in, making it challenging to switch to other tools if needed in the future.

JetBrains TeamCity features and specs

  • Integration Capabilities
    TeamCity offers excellent integration capabilities with various tools including version control systems like Git, Subversion, and Mercurial. It can also integrate with build and test tools, enhancing flexibility.
  • Distributed Build Management
    The platform supports distributed builds, allowing developers to spin up multiple build agents. This improves build efficiency and reduces bottlenecks in the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    TeamCity provides comprehensive reporting features that include test history and statistics, helping teams maintain high visibility over the build and testing processes.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The interface is intuitive and user-friendly, allowing new users to easily navigate and set up their projects and builds without requiring extensive training.
  • Extensibility
    TeamCity is highly extensible with a variety of plugins available to extend its functionality, making it adaptable to a wide range of project requirements.

Possible disadvantages of JetBrains TeamCity

  • Complex Configuration
    For large and complex projects, the initial configuration of TeamCity can be quite intricate, requiring significant time and expertise to set up correctly.
  • Resource Intensive
    TeamCity can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable system resources to run efficiently, which can be a constraint for smaller teams or organizations.
  • Licensing Cost
    Though it offers a free tier, the costs associated with its commercial licenses can be high, especially for larger teams or enterprises looking to use advanced features.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, mastering all of TeamCity's features can take time, posing a steep learning curve for users who are new to continuous integration tools.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of TeamCity has limitations on the number of build configurations and agents, which might not be sufficient for larger projects or teams.

Analysis of Earthly

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Earthly is considered good, especially for teams looking to streamline their build processes and enhance productivity. Its features and ease of use make it a valuable tool in modern software development workflows.

Why this product is good

  • Earthly (earthly.dev) is praised for its user-friendly approach to automating builds and CI/CD pipelines. It is particularly appreciated for its ability to run builds locally in the same environment as in continuous integration, thus ensuring consistency. Earthly also allows the reusability of build steps and has a minimal learning curve, especially for those familiar with Docker.

Recommended for

  • Development teams looking to simplify their build processes
  • Organizations seeking consistent build environments across local and CI systems
  • Developers familiar with Docker who want an easy transition
  • Projects with complex build dependencies that require reusable steps

Earthly videos

Earthly souls and spirits moon oracle - De Terri Foss - Review ♥️♥️

More videos:

  • Review - Special Valentine's Day Review - Earthly Body EDIBLE Massage Products! Vegan and CF!
  • Review - Earthly Touches Review

JetBrains TeamCity videos

No JetBrains TeamCity videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Earthly and JetBrains TeamCity)
Continuous Integration
64 64%
36% 36
DevOps Tools
60 60%
40% 40
Continuous Deployment
51 51%
49% 49
API Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Earthly and JetBrains TeamCity. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Earthly seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 51 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Earthly mentions (51)

  • DevOps in 2025: the future is automated, git-ified, and kinda scary but fun.
    Earthly — CI/CD that runs like code, repeatably and fast. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
  • We're Leaving Kubernetes
    Have folks seen success with https://earthly.dev/ as a tool in their dev cycle? - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • I Like Makefiles
    Many have mentioned just, but I'm a much bigger fan of Earthly [0]. It allows you to write something similar to a Makefile, but everything runs in Docker. This gets you isolated builds with parallelism and caching built-in. I've found it to be great especially for small to medium projects. For some examples, I use it to publish my personal site/blog [1] and to build a C/C++/Fortran/Rust cross-compiler targeting... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Faster Docker builds using a remote BuildKit instance
    This is basically what we do, except we use Earthly[1]. An Earthly satellite is basically a modified remote Docker Buildkit instance. [1]: https://earthly.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • I stopped worrying and loved Makefiles
    Make is excellent if you use it properly to model your dependencies. This works really well for languages like C/C++, but I think Make really struggles with languages like Go, JavaScript, and Python or when your using a large combination of technologies. I've found Earthly [0] to be the _perfect_ tool to replace Make. It's a familiar syntax (combination of Dockerfiles + Makefiles). Every target is run in an... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

JetBrains TeamCity mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JetBrains TeamCity yet. Tracking of JetBrains TeamCity recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Earthly and JetBrains TeamCity, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

Buildbot - Python-based continuous integration testing framework

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Buildkite - Buildkite is a platform for running fast, secure, and scalable continuous integration pipelines on your own infrastructure.

Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.