dwm VS foobar2000
Compare dwm VS foobar2000 and see what are their differences
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives.
featured
dwm
i3
awesome
bspwm
Xmonad
Openbox
Fluxbox
IceWM
foobar2000
VLC Media Player
AIMP
MusicBee
Winamp
Clementine
Spotify
TIDAL
foobar2000Based on our record, dwm seems to be a lot more popular than foobar2000. While we know about 63 links to dwm, we've tracked only 3 mentions of foobar2000. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
This is sort of the suckless approach. Most (all?) of their projects are customized by editing the source and recompiling. From their window manager, dwm: dwm is customized through editing its source code, which makes it extremely fast and secure - it does not process any input data which isn't known at compile time, except window titles and status text read from the root window's name. You don't have to learn... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
> Their philosophy[1] says nothing of the sort Their philosophy doesn't, but their page for dwm[0] does :D "Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it's pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions. There are some distributions that provide binary packages though." [0] https://dwm.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
I was looking for a minimal linux distribution that is light on resources, and I found one called Metis Linux, which is based on Artix. The interesting part of metis is that it wasn't using a desktop environment, but a windows manager called dwm. At the time, metis linux had a minimal bash script installer via chroot. This took longer to setup, but I had a better understanding of what the setup involved rather... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
The window manager in this screenshot is DWM in floating mode (https://dwm.suckless.org) with a lot of patches and a compositor (to make DWM support transparency). And the terminal is st with some patches. Both should be compiled from source manually. And both are configured in C. Source: 12 months ago
In my programs there's usually a core insight or mental model that makes the code simple and straightforward to understand. What does someone need to have in their mind to understand this program? Then time happens and then the code is adapted and refactored and more features are added, then the original gem of mental model is hidden by hundreds of files and the algorithm is split into 10s of files for the little... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Foobar2000. There is no macOS music player that comes close; QuodLibet almost hits the spot, but that's a very large "almost". Source: 12 months ago
Putting WinAmp nostalgia aside, have you heard of https://foobar2000.org? Source: over 1 year ago
I would 100% agree if it weren't for the existence of the music player foobar2000. Both share similar design goals. But foobar takes it a step further by making the entire UI completely user customizable with a simple built in editor. All without sacrificing speed, compactness, or usability. Source: about 3 years ago
i3 - A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.
VLC Media Player - VLC is a free and open source cross-platform multimedia player and framework.
awesome - A dynamic window manager for the X Window System developed in the C and Lua programming languages.
AIMP - AIMP : Free Audio Player : Официальный сайт программы
bspwm - A tiling window manager based on binary space partitioning
MusicBee - While iTunes might be the benchmark music organizer and player app, MusicBee is a strong alternative that many prefer.