Drudge Report VS Gab

Submit url and headline to drudgereport.com. Source: 6 months ago

This was a “you” problem from the minute it began. Mindless group thinking Americans were gaslight once again to “Stand with Ukraine” as trillions of our tax dollars get funneled through politicians and arms dealers to one of the most corrupt governments that ever existed - as the Country of Ukraine is destroyed and its people killed and maimed. This guy is an actor - who played President of Ukraine on a TV show... Source: over 1 year ago

Has anyone ever seen https://drudgereport.com/. Source: over 1 year ago

Then I went to the drudgereport.com right now and Biden is talking about a New World Order. Something Alex Jones readily talks about. I know it's not the narrative here so let the downvotes happen and probably a ban. But Biden did just talk about it. It's the truth. Source: about 2 years ago

Have you ever been to drudgereport.com? Or lewrockwell.com? Or rense.com or based.cooking? Source: about 2 years ago

If you want uncensored.. https://gab.ai. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

I don't understand how you can stop spam yet not have the structures in place to censor forbidden views or opinions. Without admin moderation you get 50 million flavours of porn (like old Usenet servers) some of which will be illegal porn, a massive slice of QAnon and conspiracy (like Odyssee and gab.ai), information and propaganda useful to terrorists (like the old totse.com) and dark web drug markets. Source: about 2 years ago

This already exists in the "Dissenter browser" made by the folks over at gab.ai. This could work as a third party extension, but direct support from Brave would instantly draw controversy as it's perceived that the only reason Dissenter exists is to support toxic radical right wingers. Source: over 2 years ago

I feel that there is still space for a platform for content creators which is away from any restrictions. I was talking to a lawyer friend of mine about drafting a user agreement which makes it impossible for anyone to sue any content creator or the platform, or for any government or group to force removal of content. but in the end we figured that we would need a back to back agreement with our service... Source: almost 3 years ago