Software Alternatives & Reviews

DriveHQ VS Amazon FSx for Lustre

Compare DriveHQ VS Amazon FSx for Lustre and see what are their differences

DriveHQ logo DriveHQ

DriveHQ is the first Cloud IT solution provider with the best customer support.

Amazon FSx for Lustre logo Amazon FSx for Lustre

Fully managed Lustre file system for compute-intensive workloads like high performance (HPC) and machine learning (ML).
  • DriveHQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-14
  • Amazon FSx for Lustre Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-05

DriveHQ videos

Setup/Using FTP Hosting Service on DriveHQ

More videos:

  • Review - Sharing Methods on DriveHQ
  • Review - DriveHQ Service Cancellation
  • Tutorial - DriveHQ cloud IT features walkthrough - Part 1
  • Tutorial - DriveHQ cloud IT features walkthrough - Part 2 - Group Management
  • Tutorial - DriveHQ WebDAV Drive Mapping / Cloud File Server service

Amazon FSx for Lustre videos

Amazon FSx for Lustre: Persistent Storage Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Amazon FSx for Lustre - AWS Online Tech Talks

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to DriveHQ and Amazon FSx for Lustre)
Cloud Storage
62 62%
38% 38
Work Collaboration
50 50%
50% 50
Project Management
52 52%
48% 48
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using DriveHQ and Amazon FSx for Lustre. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon FSx for Lustre seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

DriveHQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of DriveHQ yet. Tracking of DriveHQ recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Amazon FSx for Lustre mentions (2)

  • Mountpoint – file client for S3 written in Rust, from AWS
    I think theres an interesting story in software ecosystems where there are two flavors of applications (which coexist) that prefer object stores over filesystems and vice versa. Good reference point for this I think exists in many modern video transcoding infrastructures. Using something like FSx [1] gives you a performant option for the use cases when the tooling involved prefers filesystem semantics. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Will ChatGPT replace Google Search Now
    Amazon FSx for Lustre high-performance Storage with Amazon EC2 Trn1 instances, powered by AWS Trainium accelerators, are purpose built for high-performance (DL) training while offering up to 50% cost-to-train savings over comparable GPU-based instances. Trn1 instance supports up to 800 Gbps of Elastic Fabric Adapter networking bandwidth. Each Trn1 instance also supports up to 80 Gbps of Amazon Elastic Block Store... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing DriveHQ and Amazon FSx for Lustre, you can also consider the following products

Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage

Azure File Storage - Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.

Igloo Software - Igloo is a modern intranet, it connects people with the information they need to do their best work.

Google Cloud Resource Manager - Resource Manager provides methods that you can use to programmatically manage your projects on Google Cloud Platform.

Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

IBM Cloud File Storage - IBM Cloud File Storage is flash-backed, durable, fast, and flexible NFS-based file storage.