Based on our record, Processing seems to be a lot more popular than Draft.js. While we know about 334 links to Processing, we've tracked only 24 mentions of Draft.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I've always used Quill and always satisfied with it. It can be adapted to React Native as well. Despite the most popular RTE is Draft js it has some limitations on mobile. Source: 11 months ago
To be able to create an editor, the only requirement is to know how to set up a ReactJS (or NextJs) project. We're going to use draft-js and contenido packages in this tutorial. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Briefly and as the draft-js official site says, its a. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
I want to note that it was previously decided to use DraftJS as HTML-WYSIWYG implementation. Looking ahead I want to emphasize that I wasn’t going to “reinvent the wheel”. On the opposite, the first thing I did was a search for similar solutions. But to my astonishment, I haven’t found even a single similar solution. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
If you want to write the GUI code in Rust, you'd need something like Dioxus (which uses Tauri under the hood). But note that the Rust GUI ecosystem is still new, so I doubt we have something like Draft.js (a wysiwyg editor component for React). There's a lot of complexity involved in writing a text editor, and I'll suspect you'll have to handle a lot of that yourself. Source: almost 2 years ago
The Processing Foundation is thrilled to announce the open call for pr05 (pronounced “pros”), a new grant and mentorship initiative designed to support the professional growth of early to mid-career software developers through hands-on involvement in open-source projects. This is a unique opportunity to grow as a developer while making a tangible impact on software projects used by millions of creatives, artists,... - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
Reply I disagree. There are so many creative tools that are now online that you can access from your browser that were not envisioned in the original web. It is obviously true that not EVERY website is about creation (but to expect that seems unreasonable?), but even Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Examples include products from big vendors like Adobe's Photoshop, to smaller products like SketchUp, to more... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
Would processing[0] be a good fit? It's designed to be easy to use and learn but powerful enough for professional use. Very quick to get cool stuff moving on a screen and the syntax is Java with a streamlined editing environment. [0] https://processing.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Processing? https://processing.org/ Or do you specifically mean mathematical diagrams and a DSL specifically for that? - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I would personally use the language Processing. It's the one I use the most. And it's relatively easy to start drawing text, squares, and do other kinds of things. (It's kind of like java, but without all the boilerplate code). Source: 6 months ago
ProseMirror - A toolkit for building rich-text editors on the web
p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences
Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor
TouchDesigner - TouchDesigner is a visual development platform that equips you with the tools you need to create stunning realtime projects and rich user experiences.
Trix - A rich text editor for everyday writing.
Pure Data - Pd (aka Pure Data) is a real-time graphical programming environment for audio, video, and graphical...