DonorSee VS Buck

Fully fund DONORSEE projects https://donorsee.com. Source: almost 3 years ago

The huge problem might be the inability of most people on here to realize that theirs is not the only legitimate perspective but I guess you could be right. Either way, no one one here sees open to exploring that possibility. Guess I’ll see my way out. PS. If you do like donating to food banks and such, check out DonorSee. It’s a great way to help out people in need and see the results. Source: about 3 years ago

I felt the same way but the discovery of Donorsee helped me find a way to give that felt meaningful. Source: about 3 years ago

We use Buck company wide. Our packaging / deployment system, for example, expects to be given a Buck target to build, not a pre-built binary - I can’t just build my app with dotnet and upload it. While it is possible for a Buck target to be a simple bash command (i.e dotnet publish), doing so makes the target “opaque” - Buck wouldn’t have any knowledge of my app’s build graph so I’d lose many of the benefits it... Source: 11 months ago

Oh excellent, then better (and more portable!) tools are available: http://pants.build https://ninja-build.org https://buck.build and, if you hate yourself: https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Pioneered by tech giants like Google and Meta with tools like Bazel and Buck, monorepos are seeing widespread adoption across companies of all sizes and industries. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Buck has a http_file() that you can use this way, and it has first-class support for Java. Source: almost 2 years ago

That's a good bridge into saying that we don't use pretty much any standard tooling. Our build system is Buck, we use Mercurial instead of Git, and the IDE of choice seems to be Visual Studio (although Android Studio is supported, with some custom plugins required). Source: about 2 years ago