Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Distcc VS TinyBuilder

Compare Distcc VS TinyBuilder and see what are their differences

Distcc logo Distcc

GitHub is where people build software. More than 27 million people use GitHub to discover, fork, and contribute to over 75 million projects.

TinyBuilder logo TinyBuilder

tinyBuild is the indie label behind games like Hello Neighbor, Clustertruck, Punch Club, Party Hard and more
  • Distcc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • TinyBuilder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-28

Distcc features and specs

  • Parallel Compilation
    Distcc allows distributed compilation of C, C++, and Objective-C code, enabling the use of multiple machines to speed up the build process significantly.
  • Scalability
    The system can easily be scaled by adding more machines, which allows for handling larger projects or reducing build times with minimal configuration effort.
  • Resource Utilization
    It optimizes the use of available computing resources by offloading tasks to less busy or more powerful machines, leading to more efficient compilation.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Distcc can be used on various operating systems, including Unix-like systems and Windows, offering flexibility in mixed-environment setups.
  • Ease of Integration
    As a compiler wrapper, Distcc can be integrated with existing build systems such as Make, CMake, and others with minimal changes needed.

Possible disadvantages of Distcc

  • Network Dependency
    Performance is heavily dependent on network reliability and speed, as source files and object files are transferred between client and server machines.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up Distcc requires precise configuration, including managing different compiler versions across machines, which can be challenging in heterogeneous environments.
  • Security Concerns
    Without proper security measures, there is a risk of exposing sensitive data or code to untrusted machines, especially if Distcc is used over a public network.
  • Limited Error Handling
    Troubleshooting errors can be difficult because logs and errors might be scattered across different machines, making it hard to diagnose compilation issues.
  • Inefficiency for Small Builds
    For small codebases or projects with minimal compilation times, the overhead of distributing jobs may outweigh the benefits of parallel compilation.

TinyBuilder features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Distcc videos

Quick and dirty Distcc setup tutorial: Part 1

More videos:

TinyBuilder videos

No TinyBuilder videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Distcc and TinyBuilder)
JS Build Tools
68 68%
32% 32
Front End Package Manager
JavaScript Package Manager
Package Manager
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using Distcc and TinyBuilder. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Distcc and TinyBuilder, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

MPW Make - Macintosh Programmer's Workshop (MPW) is an open, configurable, and scriptable development environment which provides the flexibility to support complex software development projects

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Leiningen - Leiningen: automating Clojure projects