Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

DHTMLX VS Ractive.js

Compare DHTMLX VS Ractive.js and see what are their differences

DHTMLX logo DHTMLX

JavaScript Library for cross-platform web and mobile app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets. Easy integration with popular JavaScript Frameworks.

Ractive.js logo Ractive.js

Ractive.js is different.
  • DHTMLX Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27
  • Ractive.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-01

DHTMLX features and specs

  • Comprehensive Suite
    DHTMLX offers a wide range of UI components, from grids and charts to complex Gantt and scheduler components, providing a comprehensive toolkit for web application development.
  • Rich Documentation
    The platform provides extensive documentation, demos, and examples, which are invaluable for developers in understanding and implementing various components efficiently.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    DHTMLX components are designed to be fully compatible across major browsers, ensuring a consistent user experience regardless of the user's environment.
  • Support and Community
    DHTMLX offers various support options including forums and ticket-based support, alongside a strong user community that can provide insights and assistance.
  • Customizability
    The components are highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor them to fit the specific aesthetics and functionality requirements of their projects.

Possible disadvantages of DHTMLX

  • Cost
    While DHTMLX provides a free version, the full suite with advanced features requires a paid license, which can be a drawback for startups or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    With its comprehensive set of features, DHTMLX can have a steep learning curve for newcomers who are unfamiliar with its architecture and functionalities.
  • Dependency on Proprietary Framework
    Using DHTMLX can lead to a dependency on its particular frameworks and methodologies, which might be a concern for projects that prioritize open-source solutions.
  • Performance Overhead
    Implementing multiple DHTMLX components in a single application might introduce performance overhead, which requires optimization to maintain responsiveness.
  • Limited Open Source Contributions
    As a commercial library, DHTMLX might not benefit from as many open source contributions and innovations as purely open-source alternatives.

Ractive.js features and specs

  • Reactivity
    Ractive.js provides built-in reactivity, allowing for automatic updates to the UI when the underlying data changes. This makes state management and UI synchronization straightforward and intuitive.
  • Two-way Data Binding
    It supports two-way data binding, which facilitates easy synchronization between the input elements in the UI and the data model, reducing boilerplate code.
  • Template-driven
    Ractive.js uses a template-driven approach that makes defining complex UIs simple and readable, enabling developers to focus more on structure rather than imperative DOM manipulations.
  • Component Architecture
    It offers a powerful component architecture that encourages reusability and modularity of code, which is useful for maintaining large applications.
  • Lightweight
    Compared to some of the larger frameworks, Ractive.js is relatively lightweight, which can lead to faster load times and better performance.

Possible disadvantages of Ractive.js

  • Smaller Community
    Ractive.js has a smaller user community compared to popular frameworks like React or Vue.js, which can result in fewer third-party resources, libraries, and community support.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Due to its smaller adoption rate, the ecosystem around Ractive.js is not as robust, limiting the availability of plugins and integrations with other tools.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers accustomed to more popular frameworks, there might be a learning curve involved with understanding Ractive.js's unique concepts and syntax.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    Ractive.js does not receive updates as frequently as other larger frameworks, which may impact the long-term maintenance of applications built with it.
  • Not as Feature-rich
    Some developers might find Ractive.js lacking certain advanced features and integrations that are present in competitors like Angular or React.

DHTMLX videos

Dhtmlx Scheduler

More videos:

  • Review - dhtmlxGantt 6.1 Release: Time Constraints, Backward Scheduling, S-curve and dataProcessor Update
  • Review - Dhtmlx-Grid with Flux4 Part2

Ractive.js videos

No Ractive.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to DHTMLX and Ractive.js)
Javascript UI Libraries
78 78%
22% 22
JavaScript Framework
36 36%
64% 64
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using DHTMLX and Ractive.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, DHTMLX seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

DHTMLX mentions (1)

  • How Much Does It Cost To a Project Management App
    To finish projects on time, efficient time management is a must. To help managers deal with deadlines, we usually implement a fully functional Gantt chart. To create a reliable and user-friendly UI, choosing the right set of tools is essential. In our work, we usually rely on Webix, a JavaScript UI library developed by the brightest minds of XB Software. Another ace up our sleeve is JavaScript UI libraries by... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

Ractive.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Ractive.js yet. Tracking of Ractive.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing DHTMLX and Ractive.js, you can also consider the following products

Bryntum - High performance web components for SaaS apps - including Gantt, Scheduler, Grid, Calendar and Kanban widgets. Seamless integration with React, Vue, Angular or plain JS apps.

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Famous Engine - The Famous Engine is a free and open source JavaScript rendering engine.

Webix UI - An enterprise JavaScript Library for cross-platform app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets and easy integration with most popular JavaScript Frameworks.

FeathersJS - Wow your users. Build incredible real-time applications in record time.