Delve Debugger VS Cppcheck

Delve Debugger Reviews

Cppcheck Reviews

Delve Debugger mentions (11)

• The worst thing about Jenkins is that it works

  At a recent job, we had slightly different containers for local dev; our backend containers (for a Go app) had Air [1] installed for live reloading, plus Delve [2] running inside the container for VS Code's debugger to connect to. We also had a frontend container for local dev, which didn't get deployed as a container, just as static files. [1] https://github.com/cosmtrek/air. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Is there a neovim config with preconfigured debugger?

  So in my case I use https://github.com/leoluz/nvim-dap-go (which itself calls out to the CLI tool https://github.com/go-delve/delve). Source: about 1 year ago

• Program Not Compiling When No Argument Provided

  I usually set up a scratch-pad module on my machines for quickly throwing some code together to play with. For debugging/checking attributes etc. there's delve, which is usually built in to various editor's respective Go plugin. Source: over 1 year ago

• Ask HN: Why are we not using debuggers more?

  I use a debugger every day. Delve[0] Go's debugger made me love the process of debugging my code – either attaching the debugger to an existing running process or the feedback loop of debugging the test code until make it passes the test case. Back in the days when I didn't use one, it was a miserable developer experience. Thanks to Go and his great decision of having unit testing built into their standard now... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Debugging Go Inside Docker Using VSCode

  The required setup to debug a Go app running inside a Docker container is non-trivial. In this post I will walk through the configuration to achieve this using VSCode and the Delve debugger. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Cppcheck mentions (10)

• Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint

  I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Enforcing Memory Safety?

  Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: 11 months ago

• Static Code analysis

  For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 1 year ago

• How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?

  Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 1 year ago

• Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types

  Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 1 year ago