Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Cypress.io VS CodeFactor.io

Compare Cypress.io VS CodeFactor.io and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Cypress.io logo Cypress.io

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
  • Cypress.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-17
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

Cypress.io features and specs

  • Easy Setup and Configuration
    Cypress.io is known for its straightforward setup process, requiring minimal configuration to get started with writing and running tests, making it very accessible for developers new to end-to-end testing.
  • Real-time Reloads
    Cypress offers real-time reloading of tests, which improves the development experience by allowing instant feedback on test results as code changes are made.
  • Time Travel Debugging
    Cypress provides the ability to 'time travel' through tests by taking snapshots of the application state at different steps, making it easier to debug and understand failures.
  • Automatic Waiting
    Tests in Cypress automatically wait for commands and assertions, eliminating the need for manual waits and helping to avoid flaky tests due to timing issues.
  • Built-in Mocking and Stubbing
    Cypress has built-in capabilities for mocking and stubbing network requests, which simplifies testing of applications that depend on various services and APIs.
  • Rich Documentation and Community Support
    Cypress boasts comprehensive documentation and an active community, providing plenty of resources for learning and troubleshooting.
  • Cross Browser Testing
    Cypress supports testing in multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, ensuring compatibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Cypress.io

  • Limited Browser Support
    Although Cypress supports several major browsers, it does not support legacy browsers like Internet Explorer, which can be a disadvantage for projects that require testing across a wider range of browsers.
  • No Native Mobile App Testing
    Cypress does not natively support mobile app testing, limiting its use for projects that need end-to-end testing on mobile platforms.
  • Heavy Memory Usage
    Cypress can consume significant system resources, particularly memory, which may impact performance during large or complex test runs.
  • Limited Parallelism
    By default, Cypress's parallel execution capabilities are limited, which can slow down the test suite execution for larger projects, although this can be mitigated with the Dashboard Service (a paid feature).
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic tests are easy to set up, leveraging advanced features like custom commands, plugins, and complex test setups can require a steeper learning curve.
  • Incompatibility with Some Testing Ecosystems
    Cypress's architecture and testing approach can sometimes cause compatibility issues with certain testing frameworks and libraries, particularly those that are tightly coupled with traditional WebDriver-based tools.

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

Cypress.io videos

+ Add

Introduction to automation testing with Cypress.io (Non-selenium framework)

More videos:

  • Review - Testing Angular with Cypress.io | Joe Eames | AngularConnect 2018

CodeFactor.io videos

+ Add

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cypress.io and CodeFactor.io)

Cypress.io

CodeFactor.io

Automated Testing
100 100%
Automated Testing
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
Code Coverage
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
Code Quality
0 0%
Code Quality
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Cypress.io and CodeFactor.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cypress.io and CodeFactor.io

Cypress.io Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Cypress is a holistic automation testing framework where the tester can perform unit, integration, end-to-end, and regression testing. Additionally, they may orchestrate and unify outcomes with quality measurements and useful insights that support the agile workplace by leveraging the Cypress cloud.
Source: www.lambdatest.com
Top 10 Perfecto alternatives with Zebrunner on top
- is a SaaS web app for easy scaling test runs and debugging failed tests. Pairs with the open source Cypress Test Runner.
Source: zebrunner.com

CodeFactor.io Reviews

We have no reviews of CodeFactor.io yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cypress.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cypress.io mentions (27)

  • Ensuring Web Accessibility with Cypress: A Comprehensive Guide
    Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Scenario Outline: Verify all WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify all Accessibility Violations Scenario Outline: Verify P1,P2 WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify only P1, P2 issues Examples: | url | | https://google.com | | https://amazon.in | | https://agoda.com | |... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Simulating Internet Outage and Recovery using Cypress
    In this blog post, we'll explore a Cypress test that replicates this scenario, utilizing the powerful intercept command to manipulate network requests and responses. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Scraping a site?
    Maybe something like Cypress is what you're looking for? Cypress.io. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to write tests in Django for JavaScript fetch
    You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: about 2 years ago
  • What's your CI/CD flow made of?
    How are they run (services (ie. GitHub Action Runners, SauceLabs, Cypress.io, etc.), or self hosted autoscaling infrastructures)? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

CodeFactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeFactor.io yet. Tracking of CodeFactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cypress.io and CodeFactor.io, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

Loading...