Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cypress.io VS BrowseEmAll

Compare Cypress.io VS BrowseEmAll and see what are their differences

Cypress.io logo Cypress.io

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

BrowseEmAll logo BrowseEmAll

Cross browser testing tool BrowseEmAll. Test your website in more than 25 web and mobile browsers on your local machine. No cloud services involved!
  • Cypress.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-17
  • BrowseEmAll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-31

Cypress.io features and specs

  • Easy Setup and Configuration
    Cypress.io is known for its straightforward setup process, requiring minimal configuration to get started with writing and running tests, making it very accessible for developers new to end-to-end testing.
  • Real-time Reloads
    Cypress offers real-time reloading of tests, which improves the development experience by allowing instant feedback on test results as code changes are made.
  • Time Travel Debugging
    Cypress provides the ability to 'time travel' through tests by taking snapshots of the application state at different steps, making it easier to debug and understand failures.
  • Automatic Waiting
    Tests in Cypress automatically wait for commands and assertions, eliminating the need for manual waits and helping to avoid flaky tests due to timing issues.
  • Built-in Mocking and Stubbing
    Cypress has built-in capabilities for mocking and stubbing network requests, which simplifies testing of applications that depend on various services and APIs.
  • Rich Documentation and Community Support
    Cypress boasts comprehensive documentation and an active community, providing plenty of resources for learning and troubleshooting.
  • Cross Browser Testing
    Cypress supports testing in multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, ensuring compatibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Cypress.io

  • Limited Browser Support
    Although Cypress supports several major browsers, it does not support legacy browsers like Internet Explorer, which can be a disadvantage for projects that require testing across a wider range of browsers.
  • No Native Mobile App Testing
    Cypress does not natively support mobile app testing, limiting its use for projects that need end-to-end testing on mobile platforms.
  • Heavy Memory Usage
    Cypress can consume significant system resources, particularly memory, which may impact performance during large or complex test runs.
  • Limited Parallelism
    By default, Cypress's parallel execution capabilities are limited, which can slow down the test suite execution for larger projects, although this can be mitigated with the Dashboard Service (a paid feature).
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic tests are easy to set up, leveraging advanced features like custom commands, plugins, and complex test setups can require a steeper learning curve.
  • Incompatibility with Some Testing Ecosystems
    Cypress's architecture and testing approach can sometimes cause compatibility issues with certain testing frameworks and libraries, particularly those that are tightly coupled with traditional WebDriver-based tools.

BrowseEmAll features and specs

  • Cross-Browser Testing
    BrowseEmAll allows users to test websites across multiple browsers, ensuring compatibility and functionality on various platforms.
  • Local Testing
    Users can perform testing on their local machines without having to deploy to a server, saving time and access to internal setups.
  • Responsive Design Testing
    The tool provides features to test and validate responsive designs across various screen sizes and devices.
  • Full-page Screenshots
    BrowseEmAll offers the ability to capture full-page screenshots, which can be useful for documenting layouts and visual elements.
  • Automation Support
    It supports automation features which help in running extended testing procedures efficiently and can be easily integrated into CI/CD pipelines.

Possible disadvantages of BrowseEmAll

  • Limited Browser Versions
    The selection of browser versions may be limited compared to other services, which can impact testing older or non-standard browsers.
  • Performance
    Running multiple browser instances simultaneously on a local machine may require significant system resources, potentially slowing down performance.
  • User Interface Complexity
    Users might find the user interface somewhat complex or less intuitive, which could lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Cost
    BrowseEmAll can be relatively expensive for small teams or individual developers compared to some other testing solutions, making it less accessible for all.
  • OS Compatibility
    While it supports major operating systems, some features or compatibility might vary across different OS environments, potentially limiting functionality for some users.

Cypress.io videos

Introduction to automation testing with Cypress.io (Non-selenium framework)

More videos:

  • Review - Testing Angular with Cypress.io | Joe Eames | AngularConnect 2018

BrowseEmAll videos

Run BrowseEmAll Natively on macOS and Linux

More videos:

  • Review - BrowseEmAll - All browsers in one place

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cypress.io and BrowseEmAll)
Automated Testing
96 96%
4% 4
Website Testing
84 84%
16% 16
Browser Testing
91 91%
9% 9
Testing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Cypress.io and BrowseEmAll. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cypress.io and BrowseEmAll

Cypress.io Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Cypress is a holistic automation testing framework where the tester can perform unit, integration, end-to-end, and regression testing. Additionally, they may orchestrate and unify outcomes with quality measurements and useful insights that support the agile workplace by leveraging the Cypress cloud.
Top 10 Perfecto alternatives with Zebrunner on top
- is a SaaS web app for easy scaling test runs and debugging failed tests. Pairs with the open source Cypress Test Runner.
Source: zebrunner.com

BrowseEmAll Reviews

We have no reviews of BrowseEmAll yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cypress.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cypress.io mentions (27)

  • Ensuring Web Accessibility with Cypress: A Comprehensive Guide
    Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Scenario Outline: Verify all WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify all Accessibility Violations Scenario Outline: Verify P1,P2 WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify only P1, P2 issues Examples: | url | | https://google.com | | https://amazon.in | | https://agoda.com | |... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Simulating Internet Outage and Recovery using Cypress
    In this blog post, we'll explore a Cypress test that replicates this scenario, utilizing the powerful intercept command to manipulate network requests and responses. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Scraping a site?
    Maybe something like Cypress is what you're looking for? Cypress.io. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to write tests in Django for JavaScript fetch
    You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: about 2 years ago
  • What's your CI/CD flow made of?
    How are they run (services (ie. GitHub Action Runners, SauceLabs, Cypress.io, etc.), or self hosted autoscaling infrastructures)? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

BrowseEmAll mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of BrowseEmAll yet. Tracking of BrowseEmAll recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cypress.io and BrowseEmAll, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.

CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

Browsershots - Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers.