CyberPanel Reviews

1. Petar Kolev

   almost 3 years ago

   Have a many problems, from installation to futures that is not OK or are missing (compared to other alternatives) and it's free only if you are Linux "guru". If you are not guru everything stop to work in the moment when you stop to pay "cloud" assistance (literally hours later) even if configuration and all setting are has previously been made, tuned and managed by the "professionals" of CyberPanel. If you have more accounts, they make you switch to Enterprise and the more expensive support (even if you only have 1 ticket) ... your support leaves and shuts down even if the server is down (through their fault). Not to mention the complaint and correct attitude ... I am very disappointed and do not recommend!

   👎 Cons:    Bugs|Missing some functions on budgeting|Minimal documentation|Missing alerts on containers
2. Vu Tru So

   | Administrator at Vu Tru So | almost 3 years ago
   The best Web Control Panels

   I love CyberPanel, easy to use, nice working.

3. John

   almost 3 years ago
   The product does not exist

   The site took my email details and never sent an activation code. Probably a SPAM site.

   🏁 Competitors:

WireGuard Reviews

CyberPanel mentions (12)

• Plesk to Free hosting manager

  Try to explore cyberpanel.net if that fit your requirements. Source: about 1 year ago

• Recommend free good web hosting control panel for linode vps 1 GB ram

  You can use https://www.cloudpanel.io/ or https://cyberpanel.net/. Source: about 1 year ago

• Install CyberPanel behind NPM Proxy

  It is recomemyand will or work installing CyberPanel behind proxy? Source: about 1 year ago

• Best Cpanel alternative in 2023 to manage multiple domains?

  I have used cyber panels I can't regret up to now—very stable and good community. https://cyberpanel.net/. Source: over 1 year ago

• I'm looking for a free web control panel (np if it's paid and cheap) -for one account- that contains at least these features..

  I have used cyberpanel for a bit, needs little bit of work but does the job and should have everything you’re looking for. Source: over 1 year ago

WireGuard mentions (9)

• Remote access from work/corporate network

  Wireguard. Wireguard uses UDP only and runs TCP sockets over UDP. Source: about 1 year ago

• Central reverse-proxy ssh access?

  Look at Wireguard. I know you don't want Yet Another VPN running alongside your IPSec, but it's less VPN and more encrypted point-to-point UDP. You can set it up on any port you wish, including common ports that might be open on an outbound smart firewall not doing deep packet inspection. That way, it can stay out of the way of your existing IPSec deployment. Source: about 1 year ago

• Official /r/rust "Who's Hiring" thread for job-seekers and job-offerers [Rust 1.69]

  We use Elixir/Erlang for our control plane, and Rust for our data plane, built on the excellent WireGuard® tunneling protocol. Source: about 1 year ago

• Globally distributed Elixir over Tailscale

  Both products are based off Wireguard which is available for all new linux distributions. https://wireguard.com . I'm not saying OP's solution is wrong, just curious what the advantages are. Other than potentially simpler client setup, what are the advantages of paying for tailscale. With the opensource tailscale, I'm not sure if you get access to an api you can use to look up the hosts. Source: about 1 year ago

• Whisper: wraps any Go io.ReadWriter in a secure tunnel using Ed25519/X25519

  Noise Protocol Framework (used by Wireguard). Source: over 1 year ago