Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CyberFlood VS Codeception

Compare CyberFlood VS Codeception and see what are their differences

CyberFlood logo CyberFlood

CyberFlood is a best-in-class solution that enables you to test the scalability and performance of your app-aware solutions.

Codeception logo Codeception

Codeception is a new full-stack testing PHP framework.
  • CyberFlood Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-27
  • Codeception Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-03

CyberFlood features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    CyberFlood offers a wide range of security testing capabilities, including vulnerability assessments, performance testing, and compliance validation, which provide a holistic view of network security.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The platform has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface that simplifies the configuration and execution of tests, making it accessible for users with varying levels of expertise.
  • Scalability
    CyberFlood is highly scalable, allowing organizations to test small networks or vast, complex infrastructures as needed without compromising on performance or accuracy.
  • Real-world Traffic Simulation
    CyberFlood can generate realistic user traffic scenarios and model sophisticated cyber threats, which helps in evaluating the effectiveness and resilience of security measures.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics on test outcomes, allowing teams to identify vulnerabilities and make informed decisions to enhance security posture.

Possible disadvantages of CyberFlood

  • Cost
    The comprehensive nature and advanced capabilities of CyberFlood can make it a costly investment, which might not be feasible for smaller organizations with limited budgets.
  • Complex Configuration
    Despite its user-friendly interface, some users may find the initial setup and configuration process to be complex, requiring a learning curve or expertise to fully utilize its capabilities.
  • Hardware Requirements
    CyberFlood may require specific hardware and resources, which can be an additional consideration for organizations in terms of configuration, maintenance, and cost.
  • Dependency on Updates
    To effectively simulate the latest threats and ensure comprehensive testing, CyberFlood relies on regular updates, which means organizations need to ensure they stay current with software and threat database updates.

Codeception features and specs

  • Unified Testing Framework
    Codeception allows you to write tests for unit, functional, and acceptance testing in one framework, offering a consistent interface and reducing the need to switch between tools.
  • BDD Support
    Codeception supports Behavior Driven Development (BDD) which enables writing human-readable test scenarios, making it easier for non-developers to understand test cases.
  • Modular Architecture
    Codeception’s modular architecture makes it highly extensible and customizable, allowing the reuse of modules and integration with popular frameworks like Symfony, Laravel, and Yii.
  • Comprehensive Suite of Helpers
    It offers a wide range of helper modules for various tasks and integrations, such as interacting with web pages and SOAP/REST APIs, which simplifies the setup of tests.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Codeception has an active community and comprehensive documentation, which provides support and examples for most use cases.

Possible disadvantages of Codeception

  • Complex Setup for Beginners
    The flexibility and feature set of Codeception might be overwhelming for newcomers, requiring more time to understand and correctly set up the environment.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Codeception’s comprehensive range of functionalities and modularity may result in a steeper learning curve compared to simpler testing frameworks.
  • Overhead for Small Projects
    For small projects, Codeception might be an overkill due to its complex configuration and multitude of features, which might not all be needed.
  • Heavy Dependency on PHP
    As Codeception is a PHP-based testing framework, teams using multiple languages or technologies might require separate solutions for non-PHP environments.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running complete acceptance tests through browsers can lead to performance overhead, especially for large test suites, possibly requiring more infrastructure and time.

CyberFlood videos

Cyberflood: Test Duration, Load Specification, and CyberFlood Default Test Templates

More videos:

  • Review - CyberFlood Data Breach Assessment Overview
  • Review - Spirent CyberFlood CyberThreat Assessment (CF CTA) - Essentials

Codeception videos

Our First Acceptance Test [6/24] Codeception & Symfony2

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to Run Codeception Tests [5/24] Codeception & Symfony2
  • Review - Bootstrapping Codeception [2/24] Codeception & Symfony2

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CyberFlood and Codeception)
Website Testing
66 66%
34% 34
Automated Testing
31 31%
69% 69
Development
77 77%
23% 23
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CyberFlood and Codeception. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Codeception seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CyberFlood mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CyberFlood yet. Tracking of CyberFlood recommendations started around Mar 2022.

Codeception mentions (8)

  • Any pro-tips for writing automated tests with Selenium PHP?
    Personal experience: - don’t use Behat unless you really needed a “story telling”, it has a intermediate layer Gherkin that you’ll need to code. You can write “Given/When/Then” steps but you’ll also need to write “php code” that will interpret this step. - using real browser be prepared for instability - any interaction with JavaScript can broken/delay execution - be prepared that this tests are call functional... Source: about 2 years ago
  • PHPUnit, do i need to learn it?
    Codeception: https://codeception.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Advice for an older symfony 4.4 project
    I would say to check out Codeception. Codeceptions has modules for Symfony and database generally. Long and short of it is that if you want you can run api tests that go into the controllers and rollback the database afterwards. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Automating Tests using CodeceptJS and Testomat.io: First Steps
    There are enough blog posts about Jest or Cypress already, so let me introduce Codecept. It comes in two flavors. There is Codeception for PHP, and there is CodeceptJS for JavaScript which we will be using here. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Testing PHP Applications
    There are many tools you can use for this purpose, but one I particularly like is CodeCeption. What I like most about it is that it's a unified tool that can be used to perform several types of tests, acceptance being one of them. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CyberFlood and Codeception, you can also consider the following products

dotCover - JetBrains dotCover is a .NET unit test runner and code coverage tool that integrates with Visual Studio.

PHPUnit - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Testing Frameworks

DevTest - Test management solution for efficient quality assurance

PEST - An elegant PHP testing framework with a focus on simplicity

ReadyAPI Performance - ReadyAPI Performance is a platform that offers Load Testing for REST and SOAP APIs, Microservices, and Databases.

Playwright - Playwright is automation software for Chromium, Firefox, Webkit using the Node.js library having a single API in place.