Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CutyCapt VS web-capture

Compare CutyCapt VS web-capture and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CutyCapt logo CutyCapt

CutyCapt is a small cross-platform command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web...

web-capture logo web-capture

Capture a full web page screenshot online
  • CutyCapt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-11
  • web-capture Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-15

CutyCapt features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    CutyCapt is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it accessible to a wide range of users regardless of their operating system.
  • Simple Command-Line Interface
    Its command-line interface is straightforward, making it easy to integrate into scripts and automation tasks for capturing web page screenshots.
  • Supports Multiple Output Formats
    CutyCapt supports various output formats such as PNG, JPEG, SVG, and PDF, allowing users to choose the format that best suits their needs.
  • Lightweight
    The tool is lightweight, which means it does not require extensive resources to operate, making it suitable for systems with limited capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of CutyCapt

  • Limited Modern Web Technology Support
    As an older tool, CutyCapt may not fully support modern web technologies or correctly render pages that use advanced features like HTML5, CSS3, or JavaScript.
  • Dependency on Qt
    CutyCapt requires the Qt framework to be installed on the system, which may be cumbersome for users who do not have it already configured.
  • No Active Development
    The project has not seen active development in recent years, which might lead to issues with compatibility or security vulnerabilities that are unaddressed.
  • Lack of User-Friendly Interface
    Being a command-line tool, CutyCapt lacks a graphical user interface, which can be a barrier for non-technical users looking for a more intuitive experience.

web-capture features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Web-capture.net is user-friendly with a simple interface, enabling users to quickly capture web pages without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • No Installation Required
    Since it's a web-based tool, users do not need to install any software, making it accessible from any device with internet access.
  • Free Service
    Offers a free version for basic web page capturing needs, which is beneficial for occasional users.
  • Multiple Format Support
    Allows saving captures in various formats such as PDF, JPEG, and PNG, giving users flexibility based on their needs.
  • Quick Captures
    The tool performs page captures quickly, which is useful for users needing fast results.

Possible disadvantages of web-capture

  • Limited Features in Free Version
    Advanced features might be restricted to paid versions, limiting the free version to basic functionality.
  • Ads and Promotions
    Free use of the service may involve encountering ads, which can be distracting for some users.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    Users might experience slow performance or errors during high traffic periods or due to server limitations.
  • Lack of Customization
    The tool may lack advanced customization options compared to more robust software solutions.
  • Internet Dependency
    Being a web tool, it requires a stable internet connection, which can be a disadvantage in areas with poor connectivity.

CutyCapt videos

Cutycapt & تحميل المواقع ك صورة او ملف pdf

web-capture videos

No web-capture videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CutyCapt and web-capture)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Screenshot Annotation
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
HTML To PDF
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CutyCapt and web-capture. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CutyCapt seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CutyCapt mentions (1)

  • Is there a oneliner to take a screenshot of a URL?
    I would go with http://cutycapt.sourceforge.net/ old but still small and useful. Source: over 2 years ago

web-capture mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of web-capture yet. Tracking of web-capture recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CutyCapt and web-capture, you can also consider the following products

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

iWeb2X - iWeb2x combines both iWeb2Print and iWeb2Shot. Convert web page to printer friendly PDF

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Paparazzi! - Paparazzi! is a small utility for Mac OS X that makes screenshots of webpages.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

BrowseShot - BrowseShot lets you capture a PNG of the full scrollable area of a website.