Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CutyCapt VS BrowserStack

Compare CutyCapt VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

CutyCapt logo CutyCapt

CutyCapt is a small cross-platform command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web...

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • CutyCapt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-11
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999

CutyCapt features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    CutyCapt is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it accessible to a wide range of users regardless of their operating system.
  • Simple Command-Line Interface
    Its command-line interface is straightforward, making it easy to integrate into scripts and automation tasks for capturing web page screenshots.
  • Supports Multiple Output Formats
    CutyCapt supports various output formats such as PNG, JPEG, SVG, and PDF, allowing users to choose the format that best suits their needs.
  • Lightweight
    The tool is lightweight, which means it does not require extensive resources to operate, making it suitable for systems with limited capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of CutyCapt

  • Limited Modern Web Technology Support
    As an older tool, CutyCapt may not fully support modern web technologies or correctly render pages that use advanced features like HTML5, CSS3, or JavaScript.
  • Dependency on Qt
    CutyCapt requires the Qt framework to be installed on the system, which may be cumbersome for users who do not have it already configured.
  • No Active Development
    The project has not seen active development in recent years, which might lead to issues with compatibility or security vulnerabilities that are unaddressed.
  • Lack of User-Friendly Interface
    Being a command-line tool, CutyCapt lacks a graphical user interface, which can be a barrier for non-technical users looking for a more intuitive experience.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

CutyCapt videos

Cutycapt & تحميل المواقع ك صورة او ملف pdf

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CutyCapt and BrowserStack)
Website Testing
4 4%
96% 96
Browser Testing
5 5%
95% 95
Automated Testing
4 4%
96% 96
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CutyCapt and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CutyCapt and BrowserStack

CutyCapt Reviews

We have no reviews of CutyCapt yet.
Be the first one to post

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack should be more popular than CutyCapt. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CutyCapt mentions (1)

  • Is there a oneliner to take a screenshot of a URL?
    I would go with http://cutycapt.sourceforge.net/ old but still small and useful. Source: over 2 years ago

BrowserStack mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CutyCapt and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Browsershots - Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers.