Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cucumber VS RasterizeHTML.js

Compare Cucumber VS RasterizeHTML.js and see what are their differences

Cucumber logo Cucumber

Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

RasterizeHTML.js logo RasterizeHTML.js

Renders HTML into the browser's canvas.
  • Cucumber Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-19
  • RasterizeHTML.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-07

Cucumber features and specs

  • Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) Framework
    Cucumber supports BDD, allowing collaboration between developers, testers, and non-technical stakeholders to improve the quality of development through clear specifications.
  • Gherkin Syntax
    Utilizes the Gherkin language to write test cases in plain English, making them more readable and understandable for non-technical team members.
  • Integrates with Other Tools
    Easily integrates with other testing and development frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, and Selenium, enhancing its flexibility and utility.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, Cucumber allows for extensive customization and community support, reducing the cost of setting up a testing framework.
  • Supports Multiple Languages
    Offers support for various programming languages including Java, Ruby, and JavaScript, making it versatile for different project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Cucumber

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Requires a good understanding of both BDD practices and Cucumber’s structure, which might be challenging for beginners.
  • Performance Overheads
    Execution of Cucumber tests can be slower compared to other testing frameworks, making it less ideal for very large projects requiring fast feedback loops.
  • Verbose Code
    Writing tests in Gherkin can lead to more verbose code, which might require additional maintenance and can become cumbersome over time.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies for integrating Cucumber with other testing frameworks can be complex, requiring careful coordination.
  • Not Ideal for Unit Testing
    Cucumber is more suited for acceptance and integration testing rather than unit testing, potentially necessitating additional tools for a comprehensive testing strategy.

RasterizeHTML.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Cucumber videos

Madam Kilay Skin Magical Review / Orange cucumber review

More videos:

  • Review - Puff Bar - Cucumber Review (Best Disposable Vape Brand)
  • Review - THE CUCUMBER CHALLENGE! (1 MILLION SUBSCRIBER SPECIAL)
  • Tutorial - Cucumber automation suit

RasterizeHTML.js videos

No RasterizeHTML.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cucumber and RasterizeHTML.js)
Automated Testing
89 89%
11% 11
Browser Testing
84 84%
16% 16
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Cucumber and RasterizeHTML.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cucumber and RasterizeHTML.js

Cucumber Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
Cucumber itself is not a test automation tool but a framework that supports BDD. It is often used in conjunction with Selenium to provide a layer where test scenarios are written in a way that is understandable by all team members. Unlike Selenium, which focuses on automating browser actions, Cucumber focuses on defining behavior and can be used to drive Selenium tests.
Source: bugbug.io
5 Selenium Alternatives to Fill in Your Top Testing Gaps
Business testers are likely to prefer to use Cucumber over Selenium since script Cucumber lets you write test scenarios using a plain-English scripting language called Gherkin. Using Gherkin instead of code makes test script creation a much simpler process, since anyone can read, write, and understand the scripts regardless of testing experience.
Source: www.perfecto.io
Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2018 (Comprehensive List)
Cucumber is an open-source tool that is designed over the concept of BDD (Behavior-driven development). It is used to perform the automated acceptance testing by running the examples that best describe the behavior of the application. It gets you a single up-to-date living document that is having both specification and test documentation.

RasterizeHTML.js Reviews

We have no reviews of RasterizeHTML.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cucumber seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cucumber mentions (1)

RasterizeHTML.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RasterizeHTML.js yet. Tracking of RasterizeHTML.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cucumber and RasterizeHTML.js, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

html2canvas - JavaScript library to take "screenshots" of webpages or parts of it, directly on the...

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

DOM to Image - JavaScript library to generate an image from a DOM node using HTML5 canvas.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.