Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CSS Crusher VS Underscore.js

Compare CSS Crusher VS Underscore.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CSS Crusher logo CSS Crusher

Free CSS Minifier/Compressor. Works with media queries, keyframes, ...

Underscore.js logo Underscore.js

Underscore is a utility-belt library for JavaScript that provides a lot of the functional...
Not present
  • Underscore.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-17

CSS Crusher features and specs

  • Efficiency
    CSS Crusher reduces the size of CSS files by eliminating unnecessary spaces and comments, enhancing loading times and improving website performance.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool provides an easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced developers to optimize their CSS without hassle.
  • Free to Use
    The service is available at no cost, making it an attractive option for developers and designers looking to optimize CSS without financial investment.
  • Instant Results
    CSS Crusher processes files quickly, providing immediate feedback and results, which makes it convenient for rapid development cycles.
  • Web-Based
    Being a web-based tool, it requires no installation or system configuration, allowing users to access it from any device with an internet connection.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Crusher

  • Limited Features
    CSS Crusher primarily focuses on minifying CSS, lacking advanced features such as CSS merging or media query handling that some developers might require.
  • No Offline Version
    As a fully web-based application, it cannot be used offline, which may be inconvenient for developers working in environments with unreliable internet access.
  • Dependency on Internet Access
    The reliance on internet connectivity for accessing the tool could be a drawback for those in regions with slow or intermittent internet services.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Uploading CSS files to a third-party service may raise privacy issues, especially if the files contain sensitive or proprietary code.
  • Lack of Customization
    There may be limited options for customization in terms of how CSS is minified or processed, which could be a drawback for some advanced users seeking more control.

Underscore.js features and specs

  • Utility Functions
    Underscore.js provides a wealth of utility functions for common tasks such as map, reduce, filter, and more, making it easier to perform operations on arrays, objects, and collections.
  • Consistency
    The library offers a consistent API, which can make your code more readable and maintainable by providing a standard way to perform common programming tasks.
  • Lightweight
    Underscore.js is lightweight compared to full-featured libraries like Lodash, which can be a benefit if you're looking to minimize your application's footprint.
  • Browser Compatibility
    It supports a wide range of JavaScript environments, making it a good choice for projects that need to work across different browsers and Node.js.
  • Quick to Learn
    Easy to pick up for developers with even a basic understanding of JavaScript, due to its straightforward documentation and familiar function names.

Possible disadvantages of Underscore.js

  • Performance
    Underscore.js may not offer the same level of performance optimizations as more modern utility libraries like Lodash, potentially leading to slower execution for some tasks.
  • Limited Functionality
    While it covers many basic utility functions, its feature set is not as extensive as Lodash or other similar libraries, which provide a broader range of capabilities.
  • Outdated
    With the advent of ECMAScript 5 and later versions, many of the functions provided by Underscore.js are now natively available in JavaScript, reducing its necessity.
  • No Modularization
    Underscore does not support modular builds in the same way Lodash does, meaning you might end up including the entire library even if you only need a few functions.
  • Community and Maintenance
    While still maintained, Underscore.js has seen less active development and contributions compared to newer libraries, which could impact its long-term viability and support.

CSS Crusher videos

No CSS Crusher videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Underscore.js videos

Introduction to Underscore.JS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS Crusher and Underscore.js)
Web Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS Crusher and Underscore.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Underscore.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS Crusher mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CSS Crusher yet. Tracking of CSS Crusher recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Underscore.js mentions (23)

  • JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
    Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • KlongPy: High-Performance Array Programming in Python
    There was a step-change improvement for me when I tried expressing some JS patterns via `underscore.js` instead of procedurally: eg: http://underscorejs.org/#each Thinking of something as `each | map | filter | sum` is waaay less buggy than writing bespoke procedural code to do the same thing. No doubt there is a "cost" to it as well, but the _abstraction_ is valuable. Now, if there were a "compiler" which could... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Underscore.js: A utility library that offers a full set of functional programming helpers without extending any built-in JavaScript objects. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Mastering Node.js
    Underscore contains just about every core utility method you want. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • 8 NPM Packages for JavaScript Beginners [2024][+tutorials]
    Not too far behind is Underscore.js, another utility library that's all about enhancing your JavaScript mojo. Whether you're dealing with arrays, objects, or strings, Underscore has got something for you. It's like Lodash's sibling, offering similar functionalities but with its own flair. The choice between them is like picking between chocolate and vanilla - it really comes down to personal taste. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS Crusher and Underscore.js, you can also consider the following products

CSS Compressor and Minifier - CSS Compressor and Minifier is the best tool for compressing or minifying your CSS files online.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

CSS Compressor - Use CSS Compressor to compress CSS (CSS 1, CSS 2, CSS 2.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

URL Decode - URL Decode Online converts the given URL Encoded String to a normal URL format with special characters. Just paste the URL Encoded text and instantly decode a URL. Works with PHP, Javascript and JAVA

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.